Skip to content

CONSTRAINT-INDUCED MOVEMENT THERAPY VERSUS CROSS EDUCATION IN CHILDREN WITH CEREBRAL PALSY

Lower Limb Constraint-induced Movement Training Versus Strength Training of the Non-hemiplegic Lower Limb on Motor Performance in Children With Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy: A Randomized Control Trial.

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06704880
Acronym
NEUROLOGY
Enrollment
40
Registered
2024-11-26
Start date
2024-11-30
Completion date
2025-04-29
Last updated
2024-11-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy

Brief summary

This clinical trial aims to Compare the effectiveness of lower limb CIMT and the Strength Training of the Non-Hemiplegic lower limb on motor performance in hemiplegic children with CP. Participants will: diagnosed with hemiplegic cerebral palsy treated with CIMT or Strength training (cross-education) for a non-hemiplegic limb for 8 weeks. 3 sessions per week. Measurements will be taken at baseline and then at the end of the 8 weeks.

Detailed description

Method: 32 children with hemiplegic CP will be equally and randomly allocated to two groups (group A and B). group A will receive lower limb CIMT for the non- hemiplegic limb using whole leg orthosis and Group B will receive strengthen training for the non-hemiplegic lower limb. Both groups will receive routine physical therapy for the hemiplegic lower limb. Both groups will receive 60 minutes training session for 3 sessions per week for 8 consecutive weeks. Assessment will be at baseline then at the end of trial.

Interventions

OTHERrehabilitation

children in the CIMT group will RECIEVE lower limb CIMT for the non-hemiplegic limb using whole leg orthosis. Children in cross-education group will receive strengthening training for the non-hemiplegic lower limb

Sponsors

Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 15 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy aged age between 4 and 10. 2. (GMFCS) levels I, II and III. 3. Able to follow therapist instructions during training session.

Exclusion criteria

1. Lack of patient's cooperation. 2. Difficulty wearing constraint method due to severe joint deformation or/and contracture. 3. Patients were treated with botulinum toxin during the last 3 months. 4. Seizure disorder not fully controlled by medication.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
stride lengthat base line then at the end of the 8 weeksgait spatiotemporal parameter
gait speedat base line then at the end of the 8 weeksgait spatiotemporal parameter
cadence gait spatiotemporal parameterat base line then at the end of the 8 weeksgait spatiotemporal parameter
step lengthat base line then at the end of the 8 weeksgait spatiotemporal parameter

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pediatric balance scaleat base line then at the end of the 8 weeksPediatric balance scale The Pediatric Balance Scale is a modified version of the Berg Balance Scale that is used to assess functional balance skills in school-aged children. The scale consists of 14 items that are scored from 0 points (lowest function) to 4 points (highest function) with a maximum score of 56 points.
6 Minute walk test (6MWT)at base line then at the end of the 8 weeksendurance measurement
Modified Ashworth scaleat base line then at the end of the 8 weeksmeasuring muscle tone Scoring 0 No Increased in tone 1. Slight increase in tone giving a catch when the limb is moved in flexion or extension 1+ Slight increase in muscle tone, indicated by a catch followed by minimal resistance throughout range of motion (ROM) 2. More marked increase in tone through most of the ROM, but the limb easily flexed 3. Considerable increase in tone, passive movement difficult 4. Limb rigid in flexion or extension
Handheld dynamometerat base line then at the end of the 8 weeksmeasuring muscles strength

Countries

Saudi Arabia

Contacts

Primary Contactabdullah owaid Alanazi, PhD student
aalanazi112@moh.gov.sa800-555-5555
Backup Contactalaa ibrahim ismail, professor
aiibrahim@iau.edu.sa

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026