Skip to content

Meloxicam Versus Ibuprofen for Pain Control After Third Molar Exodontia in Adult Patients

Analgesic Efficacy of Meloxicam Versus Ibuprofen for Pain Control After Third Molar Extraction in Adult Patients: Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06704113
Enrollment
68
Registered
2024-11-25
Start date
2024-12-15
Completion date
2025-01-20
Last updated
2024-11-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Pain, Sensation Disorders

Keywords

Tooth Extraction, Molar, Third, Meloxicam, Ibuprofen

Brief summary

Third molar extraction is a common dental procedure, offently related with pain and swelling. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if Meloxicam has a better effect relieving pain after the extraction than Ibuprofen, one of the most common pain relieving drugs administered after this procedure.

Detailed description

Summary: Third molar extractions are one of the most common procedures in dental practice. However, pain and swelling as postoperative sequelae are inevitable. Depending on the level of pain, which can range from moderate to severe, this symptomatology can be accompanied with pharmacological treatment, thus generating a less traumatic recovery for the patient. It is currently known that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have proven to be effective for the treatment of mild and moderate postoperative pain. Due to the wide variety of NSAIDs, it is important to know how to choose the most effective option when indicating one therapeutic option over another. Objective: To evaluate the postoperative analgesic effectiveness of meloxicam (7.5 mg) compared to ibuprofen (400 mg) in patients undergoing third molar(s) extraction. Design: Randomized controlled clinical trial, double-masked, designed according to CONSORT guideline requirements.

Interventions

DRUGmeloxicam 7,5mg

Comparison of analgesic efficacy of Meloxicam Vs Ibuprofen

Sponsors

Universidad Austral de Chile
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 59 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Maxillary or mandibular third molar with semi or fully erupted crown.

Exclusion criteria

Patients with Systemic pathologies. Presence of third molar localized infection. Completely included third molar crown. Periodontal compromise. Pregnant or breastfeeding women. Patients with hypersensitivity to NSAIDs. Patients with a history of drug abuse. Patients who had taken any drug in the previous 24 hours. Intervention (exodontia) time longer than 45 minutes.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Meloxicam effectiveness for post-surgical pain control.3 daysA visual analogue scale ranging from 0 points (no pain) to 10 points (intolerable pain) will be used to measure post-exodontic pain, and values will be recorded on a questionnaire.

Contacts

Primary ContactCarla C Bertran, DDS
carlabertran@yahoo.com56632228028
Backup ContactRuth R Falcón
ruth.falcon@alumnos.uach.cl56 940376396

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026