Skip to content

Healthrelated Quality of Life and Experiences of a Heart Rehabilitation Programme After Care for Infective Endocarditis.

Healthrelated Quality of Life and Experiences of a Heart Rehabilitation Programme After Care for Infective Endocarditis. A Quantitave and Qualitative Study With Mixed Methods.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06704048
Enrollment
50
Registered
2024-11-25
Start date
2024-08-22
Completion date
2035-08-01
Last updated
2026-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bacterial Infections, Cardiac Rehabilitation, Infective Endocarditis, Patient Participation

Keywords

Infective Endocarditis, Bacterial Infections, Patient Participation, Interview, Qualitative Research, Cardiac rehabilitation

Brief summary

How does health develop after Infective endocarditis (IE)? Can the health of patients with IE be improved by participation in the physical exercise training within cardiac rehabilitation program? Participants will: * Answer digitally surveys on the perceived health for 4 times during 1 year * Participate in interviews on patient's experiences of health and rehabilitation 1 time before and 2 times after the training program during I year. * Be physically evaluated by a physiotherapist before and after the progam of physical exercise training within cardiac rehabilitation. * Do individual exercises in a group led by a physiotherapist 2 times weekly during 12 weeks.

Detailed description

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a rare but severe infectious disease of the heart. Patients with IE are treated for weeks in the hospital and have profound impairments of health for a long time after the treatment. Patients experience a delayed recovery after discharge both physically, with wasting and fatigue; and mentally, with anxiety and depression. Patients suffer from a diminished quality of life and have difficulties returning to work, up to a year post-discharge. Little is known about how patients perceive the IE disease after discharge and if patient's health can be promoted by rehabilitation since no studies have been able to evaluate the effect of interventions aimed at relieving these problems. Aspects of quality of life, mental health, self-rated health and the impact on anxiety and depression will be studied.The hypothesis is that physical exercise training within cardiac rehabilitation can improve physical capacity and reduce symptoms of fatigue. Both the patients' self-reported experiences of symptoms of fatigue and other aspects of health-related quality of life by surveys, as well as the physical improvements for 1 year after IE ( by physiotherapeutic testing) will be studied. The patients are also interviewed on expectations and experiences of the intervention and what the patients think is the optimal strategy to regain health. A mixed methods design is chosen to include both quantitative and qualitative data to evaluate the intervention. Surveys on health-related quality of life, symptoms of fatigue, anxiety, depression, and occupational balance are digitally distributed at 4 occasions during 1 year after IE. Qualitative interviews will be used 3 times the first year to evaluate the effect and meaning of the program on health and well-being. Individualized center-based evaluations according to the protocols are performed before and after the rehabilitation period. Exercises and training are performed in groups led by specialized physiotherapists 2 times per week for 12 weeks. The investigators aim to study the intervention of physical exercise training within cardiac rehabilitation on the group of patients with IE. The patients with IE will be offered physical exercise training within cardiac rehabilitation according to the protocols of SEPHIA (Secondary Prevention after Heart Intensive Care Admission), as documented in SWEDEHEART(Swedish Web-system for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-based care in Heart disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies). 50 patients treated for IE will be included in the study.

Interventions

OTHERCardiac rehabilitation

Standard hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation according to SEPHIA and SWEDEHEART protocols 2 times a week for 12 weeks with individualized physical evaluation before and after the intervention.

Sponsors

Region Halland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Mixed method

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of infective endocarditis (IE) based on Dukes ISCVID criteria and discharged after treatment for IE from the Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital of Halmstad, Region Halland, Sweden.

Exclusion criteria

* Not able to do a bicycle ergometer test or training.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quantitative - 1. Changes from test 1 before start of physical exercise training within cardiac rehabilitation to test 2 at the end of the physical exercise training period and test 3 6-12 months after the end of the physical exercise training period.18 months1 Test of maximal workload (in Watt) and time (in minutes and seconds). Submaximal exercise capacity on a symptom-limited bicycle ergometer test with an increased workload of 25W every 4.5 minutes. The exercise test is discontinued at Borg rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scale 17 and/or dyspnea 7 at Borg´s CR-10 scale. Pre-exercise screening test is compared to the post-exercise tests.
Quantitative - 2. Changes from test 1 before start of physical exercise training within cardiac rehabilitation to test 2 at the end of the physical exercise training period and test 3 6-12 months after the end of the physical exercise training period.18 months2 Muscular endurance tests with a unilateral isotonic shoulder flexion and a unilateral isotonic heel lift(maximum number of repetitions). Pre-exercise screening test is compared to the post-exercise tests.
Quantitative - 3. Changes from test 1 before start of physical exercise training within cardiac rehabilitation to test 2 at the end of the physical exercise training period and test 3 6-12 months after the end of the physical exercise training period.18 months3 Changes in symptoms of fatigue assessed by the questionnaire Mental Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) survey. The MFI is a self-report instrument designed to measure symptoms of fatigue which consists of 20 items and, by which 5 dimensions can be calculated (General Fatigue (GF), Physical Fatigue (PF), Reduced Motivation (RM), Reduced Activity (RA) and Mental Fatigue (MF)). The scale is 4-20 points, lower points are better. Pre-exercise screening test is compared to the post-exercise tests.
Quantitative - Degree of patient adherence to the program16 weeksNumber of times in physical exercise-training within cardiac rehabilitation. Full adherence is set to 12 times during 16 weeks
Qualitative - Patients's experiences on cardiac rehabilitation0, 3 months, 6-12 monthsQualitative content analysis of interviews before start of physical exercise training within cardiac rehabilitation, at the end of the physical exercise training period and 6-12 months after the end of the physical exercise training period. Descriptive.
Qualitative - Patients's experiences on post-infection health restoration6-12 monthsQualitative content analysis of interviews 6-12 months after the end of the physical exercise training period. Descriptive.
Mixed method - Hindrances and possibilities for patients in participating after IE in physical exercise training within cardiac rehabilitation program12 monthsQualitative interviews will be compared with quantitative data of participation and test result to describe and explain the findings.
Mixed method - Description and explanation on the health evolution the first year after IE among patients offered physical exercise training within cardiac rehabilitation program12 monthsQualitative interviews will be compared with quantitative data of test results on physical capacity and health-related quality of life to describe and explain the findings.

Countries

Sweden

Contacts

CONTACTHelena Lindberg, MD
helena.lindberg@regionhalland.se+4635131000
CONTACTIngrid Larsson, professor
ingrid.larsson@hh.se+46729773722
STUDY_DIRECTORIngrid Larsson, PhD,Prof

Department of Health and Nursing, School of Health and Welfare, Halmstad, Sweden

STUDY_DIRECTORMagnus Rasmussen, MD,PhD,Prof

Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Infection Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 8, 2026