Skip to content

Optimal Intravesical Lidocaine Volume for Pain Relief During Office Intra-detrusor Onabotulinum Toxin a Injections

Optimal Intravesical Lidocaine Volume for Pain Relief During Office Intra-detrusor Onabotulinum Toxin a Injections: a Prospective Randomized Superiority Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06695585
Enrollment
36
Registered
2024-11-19
Start date
2024-12-01
Completion date
2025-12-01
Last updated
2024-11-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neurogenic Bladder, Overactive Bladder, Overactive Bladder Syndrome, Urge Incontinence, Urinary Frequency, Urinary Urgency

Keywords

Bladder Botox, Intravesical lidocaine, office Botox

Brief summary

The purpose of our study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different volumes of bladder-numbing medication for pain relief at the time of office bladder Botox injections. This is a randomized prospective, double-blind superiority trial comparing 200 ml 2% lidocaine versus 30 ml 2% lidocaine for office Botox injections.

Detailed description

The volume of 2% intravesical lidocaine solution and efficacy for pain relief at the time of office intradetrusor Botox A injection has not been well studied. Studies evaluating intravesical lidocaine show that it is not sufficiently absorbed by human bladders to achieve serum toxicity levels and only provides superficial local anesthetic effect. Experts agree that intravesical local anesthetic can be given in the office, with approximately 30 to 40 mL of 2% lidocaine instilled via catheter into the bladder for about 20 minutes before injection. However, there is little evidence regarding this strategy, and future research would help standardize recommendations. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of higher volume pre-procedure intravesical lidocaine solution for pain at the time of intradetrusor office Botox injections. This is a randomized prospective, double-blind superiority trial comparing 200 ml 2% lidocaine versus 30 ml 2% lidocaine for office Botox injections.

Interventions

different volumes of intravesical 2% lidocaine without epinephrine, all patients will be receiving bladder botox but this will not be compared

Sponsors

University of Louisville
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Prospective, double-blinded, randomized superiority trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult female, \>18 years, English-speaking (surveys utilized are not validated in all languages) * Able to provide informed consent * Indications: Refractory urge urinary incontinence, Refractory urinary urgency and frequency, Neurogenic bladder (without sensory deficit)

Exclusion criteria

* Untreated urinary tract infection at the time of procedure * Contra-indication to Botox * Contraindication to intravesical lidocaine * Inability to provide informed consent * Pregnancy, breast-feeding, intending to become pregnant within 6 months of treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)on day of enrollment and procedurea. Determine the efficacy of pain relief via the Visual Analog Scale (VAS, scored 0-100 on 100 mm scale with 0 indicating no pain and 100 indicating the worst pain possible) in women randomized to 200 ml 2% lidocaine without epinephrine versus 30 ml 2% lidocaine without epinephrine prior to office intravesical onabotulinum toxin A (Botox) injections i. Perceived maximum VAS during the procedure and post-procedure ii. Superiority limit 20 mm on 100 mm VAS scale

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overactive Bladder Satisfaction with Treatment Questionnaire (OAB-Sat-q)This will be assessed pre and post-intervention for all participants through study completion, an average of 1 yearAn 11-item questionnaire that assesses patient satisfaction with their overactive bladder (OAB) treatment. It includes three sub-scales (satisfaction, side effects, and endorsement) and two single-item assessments (convenience and preference). Scores range from 0-100, higher scores indicate higher satisfaction with treatment. Used to assess treatment satisfaction over time.
Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short-Form (PSQ-18)through study completion, an average of 1 yearAn 8-item question assessing satisfaction with medical care experience, measured on a Likert scale with 1 Strongly agree and 5 Strongly disagree, for questions 1-3, 5-6, and 8 lower scores indicate higher satisfaction. For questions 4 and 7 lower scores indicate dissatisfaction.
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)through study completion, an average of 1 year7-point Likert scale with 1 indicating Very much better and 7 indicating Very much worse, lower scores indicate more improvement
Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)through study completion, an average of 1 yearLikert scale describing current severity of urinary tract condition: 1. Normal, 2. Mild, 3. Moderate, 4. Severe; higher scores indicate worse symptoms
Post-void residual volumethrough study completion, an average of 1 yearMeasure voided volume and obtain post-void residual volume either by bladder scan or straight catheterization in the office at 2-week follow up appointment (or additional time points if indicated) following bladder Botox injection
Adverse eventsthrough study completion, an average of 1 yearAll adverse events will be recorded and tracked, including urinary tract infection, urinary retention, persistent hematuria, or additional suspected procedural related complications
Bladder diarythrough study completion, an average of 1 year3-day bladder diary with objective patient reported data reporting voids per day, frequency between voids (measured in minutes or hours), episodes of incontinence per day

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactSean Francis, MD
laurel.carbone@louisvill.edu502-588-7660
Backup ContactLaurel Carbone, MD

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026