Skip to content

Radiofrequency Treatments for Lumbar Facet Joint Pain Management

Comparison of Combined Versus Conventional Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation for Lumbar Facet Joint Pain Management: a Retrospective Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06695481
Enrollment
133
Registered
2024-11-19
Start date
2023-08-01
Completion date
2023-10-01
Last updated
2024-11-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain, Zygapophyseal Joint Arthritis

Keywords

Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment, Radiofrequency Ablation

Brief summary

In this study, investigators compared the effectiveness of medial branch conventional radiofrequency application and combined radiofrequency application in patients with lumbar facet joint disease , focusing on pain scores. The combined radiofrequency application, a sequence of pulsed radiofrequency and conventional radiofrequency , has been shown to be successful in treating neck pain and headache. These findings are of significant importance in the field of pain management and spinal disorders.

Detailed description

The treatment of chronic pain using pulsed radiofrequency (RF) has not shown any significant side effects. As a result, a combined approach of using both pulsed and conventional RF treatment in the same session has been assumed since the 2010s. This combined RF method is still widely used for pain management. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of conventional RF with the combined RF method as a medial branch RF method for the management of lumbar facet joint pain.The study involved patients who had undergone medial branch denervation for lumbar facet joint pain and had medical records available. This study was conducted retrospectively by examining the study data. Patients with missing data were excluded from the study. Patients underwent a fluoroscopy-guided selective medial branch nerve block using 2% lidocaine 0.5ml before treatment. After 30 minutes, they were asked if there was a 50% reduction in pain intensity.The conventional RF group consists of patients who received medial branch RF with a duration of 2 minutes, at 80̊ C temperature, and 7 Volts. In the combined RF group, treatment was initiated first with a conventional RF duration of 2 minutes at a temperature of 80̊ C at 7 Volts. Then, pulsed RF duration was applied for 6 minutes at a temperature of 42 C at 45 Volts, with a pulse frequency of 2 Hz and a width of 20 ms.After procedure In the outpatient clinic, experienced pain specialists recorded NRS (Numeric Rating Scale) and DN4 (Douleur Neuropathic 4 Questions) scores at the 6th and 12th-month follow-up appointments after the procedure.

Interventions

PROCEDUREConventional RF

The conventional RF group consists of patients who received medial branch RF with a duration of 2 minutes, at 80̊ C temperature, and 7 Volts.

PROCEDURECombined RF

In the combined RF group, treatment was initiated first with a conventional RF duration of 2 minutes at a temperature of 80̊ C at 7 Volts. Then, pulsed RF duration was applied for 6 minutes at a temperature of 42 C at 45 Volts, with a pulse frequency of 2 Hz and a width of 20 ms.

Sponsors

Hacettepe University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 40 - 90 years of age * Patients with low back pain for more than three months and did not respond to conservative treatment

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who underwent facet joint medial branch RF treatment previously * Patients had additional interventional pain treatment or lumbar surgery within one year of the procedure * Patients had radicular and significant disc pathology, psychiatric diseases or mental problems, malignancies * Patients of one year follow-up could not be assessed entirely in the system

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neuropathic Pain ScaleScores of the patients ; before the procedure and 6 and 12 months after the procedure are shownThe 7 symptoms items are scored by interviewing the patient.The scores are added and a score of 4 or more out of ,10 point (severe pain ) .Neuropathic Pain 4 Questions (DN4)
Pain Rating ScaleThe NRS scores of the patients before the procedure and 6 and 12 months after the procedure .NRS in which individuals rate their pain on an ten-point numerical scale. Zero:''no pain at all' ten-point ''severe pain''Numeric Rating Scale

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026