Skip to content

Submerged Vs Non-Submerged Guided Bone Regeneration Simultaneous to Implant Placement.

Submerged Vs Non-Submerged Guided Bone Regeneration Simultaneous to Implant Placement.

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06695338
Enrollment
32
Registered
2024-11-19
Start date
2024-12-15
Completion date
2026-06-06
Last updated
2024-11-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bone Atrophy, Dental Implant, Guided Bone Regeneration, Submerged Regeneration

Brief summary

Dental implants are worldwide recognized one of the best manners to replace lost or hopeless prognosis teeth. There are different variables that creates proper conditions for long-term prognosis of implant treatments. Implant position and surrounding bone around them, have been described in scientific literature to be key factors in the longevity of those treatments. It has to be defined the "critical bone thickness" around implants. It basically means that implants has to be completely surrounded by bone, that will serve as protection. If the implants are not surrounded by bone, procedures as guided bone regeneration may be performed. Those procedures can be executed before or simultaneously during the implant placement. In the standard procedure, the simultaneous guided bone regeneration during implant placement requires to leave the implant and the regeneration healing below the gingiva, needing a second surgery for accesing to those implants. In this randomized controlled trial the hypothesis is to discover if not submerging this regenerations may show the same results than submerged ones. For that, the objective is to study the different variables around these regeneration to evaluate the performance of non-submerged protocol.

Interventions

PROCEDUREGuided Bone Regeneration (Submerged)

Guided Bone Regeneration by means of bone xenograft and collagen membrane (submerged approach)

PROCEDUREGuided Bone Regeneration (Non-submerged)

Guided Bone Regeneration by means of bone xenograft and collagen membrane (Non submerged Approach)

Sponsors

Universitat Internacional de Catalunya
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* • Men and women over 18 years old. * Patients requiring single-unit implant restoration in any tooth site of the maxilla and mandible in between teeth. * Anticipation of a peri-implant buccal osseous dehiscence by means of a CT imaging (cone-beam computed tomography, CBCT) with a maximum vertical dimension height (VDH) of 50%. * Presence of adjacent teeth. * Presence of antagonist teeth. * Minimum primary stability of 25Ncm. * Non-smokers or light smokers (\< 10 cigarettes per day). * Absence of systemic diseases that could influence the outcome of the therapy (i.e., uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis, biphosphonate medication). * Tooth extraction performed at least 4 months before implant placement. * Good level of oral hygiene (Plaque Index \< 25%) (Löe, 1967) * Written informed consent signed. * Keratinized mucosa of at least 2mm on the buccal and lingual of the implant.

Exclusion criteria

* Implant surgery requiring sinus lift procedure. * Previous bone augmentation at the implant site. * Active periodontal disease. * Acute infection at the rehabilitation site. * Long-term non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy (3 months). * Lactating females or currently pregnancy. * Severe cognitive or psychiatric disorders. * Unwillingness to return for follow-up examination.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Vertical bone dimensional changes0-12monthsComparison between CBCT images. Vertical bone changes in mm from initial CBCT to 12 months CBCT will be asessed.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Horizontal bone dimensional changes0-12 monthsComparison between CBCT images
Buccal Bone thickness (Dehiscence resolution)0-12 monthsComparison between CBCT images
Volumetric parameters0-12 monthsComparison between STL's models
Peri-implant clinical parameters0-12 monthsClinical variables
PROMs0-12 monthsPatient Related Outcomes. (Overall satisfaction from 1-10, Pain perceived from 1-10, Willingness to repeat in case of need from 1-10)
Marginal Bone Loss (MBL)0-12 monthsComparison between 2d xrays

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Primary ContactGermán Pardo Perl, DDS, MSc
Germanpardo@uic.es+34630083315

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026