Skip to content

The Effects of Focal Muscle Vibration Combined With Exercise on Sensorimotor Activity in Individuals With Chronic Subacromial Impingement Syndrome

The Effects of Focal Muscle Vibration Combined With Exercise on Sensorimotor Activity in Individuals With Chronic Subacromial Impingement Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06694402
Enrollment
28
Registered
2024-11-19
Start date
2025-01-08
Completion date
2026-04-30
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain, Chronic Subacromial Impingement Syndrome, Corticomotor Excitability, Electroencephalography, Focal Vibration, Intracortical Inhibition, Somatosensory Dysfunction, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Brief summary

Background: Subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) is a common shoulder disorder characterized by pain, altered movement patterns, and functional impairment. Forty-four to sixty-five percents of the patients with SIS would develop chronic symptoms. Chronic subacromial impingement syndrome (CSIS) is involved in the alteration of central nervous system, such as somatosensory dysfunction and corticomotor changes. The treatments for these patients usually focus on shoulder control and strengthening exercise but no treatment has been found to be targeted on the alterations in somatosensory dysfunction. Focal muscle vibration (FMV) is a useful tool to provide proprioceptive stimulation and has showed short-term effects of improving sensorimotor performance in both healthy and diseased individuals when combined with exercise. To our knowledge, no study has used FMV combined with shoulder exercise for individuals with shoulder problems. Purpose: To investigate the effects of FMV combined with exercise on somatosensory activity, corticomotor excitability, pain and function in individuals with CSIS. Methods: This is a randomized control trial. We will recruit ninety subjects with CSIS to receive a 12-session treatment protocol of FMV combined with shoulder exercises. The subjects will be randomized into a treatment group or control group. While the treatment group will receive 20-minute FMV when doing strength training, the control group will have the vibrators attached on but without being turned on during strength training. Both groups will have a 10-20 minutes of shoulder control training following the FMV protocol. The outcomes will be measured before and after the 12-session treatment protocol and include measures of somatosensory activity (using Electroencephalography, EEG), corticomotor excitability (using transcranial magnetic stimulation, TMS), pressure pain threshold, depression scale, pain intensity in a numerical rating scale, and shoulder function. The somatosensory measures include somatosensory-evoked potentials and event-related potentials during arm elevation. Corticomotor measures include motor evoked potentials, active and rest motor threshold and cortical silent period as well as intracortical inhibitory and facilitatory mechanisms. Shoulder function will be measured with the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand scale, the patient-specific functional scale, and the global rating of change scale. Statistical analysis: The continuous and categorical variables of basic data will be analyzed by and independent t test and a Chi-square test, respectively. A two-way mixed ANOVA will be used to test between-group and within-group intervention effects. If there is a significant interaction effect, post hoc pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni correction will be used. The alpha level is set at 0.05.

Interventions

DEVICEfocal muscle vibration combined with exercise

The treatment group will receive a 30-minute intervention in each session. Focal muscle vibration will be applied to the anterior and lateral parts of shoulder to give a sensory stimulation while participants are doing eaercise.

OTHERexercise

The control group will receive 30-minute exercise without focal muslce vibration.

Sponsors

National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Anterior or lateral shoulder pain ≥ 3 months 2. 18 to 65 years old 3. The most pain intensity ≥ 3/10 Pain-Numeric Scale (NRS) 4. SIS, at least 3 positive findings of the following tests: (1) Neer's test (2) Hawkins-Kennedy test (3) Empty can test (4) Resisted external rotation test (5) Presenting painful arc during arm elevation (6) Tenderness of the rotator cuff tendons

Exclusion criteria

1. History of dislocation, fracture, adhesive capsulitis or surgery of upper extremity 2. Neck pain 3. Shoulder flexion or abduction less than 150 degrees 4. History of direct contact injury to the neck or upper extremities within the past 12 months 5. Brain injury and neurological impairment 6. Inflammatory cause of the pain (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis) 7. Psychosis and symptom of headache or dizziness 8. Taking centrally acting medication 9. Contraindications to the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) 10. Received shoulder-related physical therapy or corticosteroid injections in the past three months. 11. Received high-concentration platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections in the shoulder joint in the past year.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Somatosensory cortical activity - Somatosensory evoked potentialsChange from baseline SEP at the completion of 12-session intervention, an average of 6 weeksSomatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) will be described with microvolt (µV) and millisecond (ms).
Corticomotor excitability measures - Active motor thresholdChange from baseline AMT at the completion of 12-session intervention, an average of 6 weeksActive motor threshold (AMT) will be described with the percentage (%) of maximum stimulator output (MSO).
Corticomotor excitability measures - Motor evoked potentialChange from baseline MEP at the completion of 12-session intervention, an average of 6 weeksMotor evoked potential (MEP) will be described with millivolt (mV).
Corticomotor excitability measures - Cortical silent periodChange from baseline CSP at the completion of 12-session intervention, an average of 6 weeksCortical silent period (CSP) will be measured with millisecond (ms)
Corticomotor excitability measures - Short interval cortical inhibitionChange from baseline SICI at the completion of 12-session intervention, an average of 6 weeksShort interval cortical inhibition (SICI) will be defined as percentage (%) of conditioning responses vs testing responses while the inter-stimulus interval is below 5 ms
Corticomotor excitability measures - Short interval cortical facilitationChange from baseline SICF at the completion of 12-session intervention, an average of 6 weeksShort interval cortical facilitation (SICF) will be defined as percentage (%) of conditioning responses vs testing responses while the inter-stimulus interval is above 5 ms
Corticomotor excitability measures - Interval cortical facilitationChange from baseline ICF at the completion of 12-session intervention, an average of 6 weeksInterval cortical facilitation (ICF) will be defined as percentage (%) of conditioning responses vs testing responses while the inter-stimulus interval is above 5 ms
Corticomotor excitability measures - Long-interval intracortical inhibitionChange from baseline LICI at the completion of 12-session intervention, an average of 6 weeksLong-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI) will be defined as percentage (%) of conditioning responses vs testing responses while the inter-stimulus interval is below 5 ms

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Shoulder pain and function-Taiwan version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaireChange from baseline DASH scores at the completion of 12-session intervention, an average of 6 weeksSubjects will be asked 30 items related to shoulder functional movement. The overall score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability).
Visual analogue scale (VAS) of shoulder painChange from baseline VAS scores at the completion of 12-session intervention, an average of 6 weeksShoulder pain and instability will be measured by visual analogue scale (VAS). Subjects need to mark the point that they feel represent their perception of their current state on a 10-cm line. Scores range from 0 (no symptom) to 100 (maximum symptom).
Depression- Taiwan version of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)Change from baseline CES-D scores at the completion of 12-session intervention, an average of 6 weeksSubjects will be asked 20 items to rate how often over the past week they experienced symptoms associated with depression. Response options range from 0 to 3 for each item. Scores range from 0 to 60, with high scores indicating greater depressive symptoms.
Pressure pain thresholdsChange from baseline PPT at the completion of 12-session intervention, an average of 6 weeksPressure pain threshold (PPT) of bilateral upper trapezius, levator scapulae, infraspinatus, pectoralis major, biceps brachii, middle deltoid and tibialis anterior will each be averaged and will be described with kg/cm2.

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORYin-Liang Lin, PhD

National Yang Ming Chaio Tung University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 30, 2026