Skip to content

Needle-Knife Fistulotomy Vs. Standard Cannulation Trial

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Needle-Knife Fistulotomy Vs. Standard Cannulation in Primary Biliary Access: a Practical Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06694038
Enrollment
186
Registered
2024-11-19
Start date
2019-01-31
Completion date
2021-07-01
Last updated
2024-11-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Biliary Obstruction Due to Common Bile Duct Stone, Malignant Bile Duct Obstruction

Keywords

jaundice, bile duct obstruction, abnormal liver enzymes

Brief summary

Needle-knife fistulotomy (NKF) is traditionally used to achieve biliary access when standard cannulation (SC) techniques are unsuccessful. Based on technical factors and the design of prior studies, the literature suggests NKF should be reserved for expert advanced endoscopists. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NKF compared to SC for primary biliary access performed by advanced endoscopists with a range of experience including advanced endoscopy trainees.

Interventions

Biliary access using needle knife fistulotomy technique

PROCEDUREstandard biliary cannulation

standard biliary cannulation

Sponsors

Thomas Jefferson University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

older than 18 years of age -

Exclusion criteria

if unable to provide informed consent, pregnant, hemodynamically unstable, with a prior known history of biliary sphincterotomy or ampullectomy \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
post ERCP pancreatitiswithin 48 hours of the procedureIncidence of post ERCP pancreatitis defined as epigastric abdominal pain with lipase more than three times the upper limit of normal occurring within 48 hours of the procedure

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bleedingwithin 48 hoursSignificant bleeding was defined as a need for transfusion and/or need for repeat endoscopy for hemostasis
Perforationwithin 48 hoursPerforation, defined by a full thickness defect either seen during endoscopy or on radiological studies post procedure.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026