Skip to content

Advanced Wireless Sensors for Neonatal Care in the Delivery Room

Advanced Wireless Sensors for Neonatal Care in the Delivery Room: the AWARD Prospective Multicenter International Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06693817
Acronym
AWARD
Enrollment
600
Registered
2024-11-18
Start date
2025-04-08
Completion date
2027-12-30
Last updated
2026-05-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Apnea of Newborn, Birth Asphyxia, Birth Outcome, Adverse, Delivery Complication, Delivery Problem for Fetus, ECG Electrode Site Reaction, Infant ALL, Infant Apnea, Infant Conditions, Infant Death, Infant, Newborn, Diseases, Newborn Asphyxia, Newborn Morbidity, Newborn; Vitality, Parents, Pregnancy Related, Sudden Unexplained Infant Death

Keywords

Delivery Room, Newborn, Neonatal Resuscitation, Wireless Technology, Vital Sign Monitoring, Sudden Unexplained Post-Natal Collapse, SUPC, Obstetrical Center, Obstetrics, Neonate, Birth, Birthing Center, C-Section, Vaginal Delivery, Sensors, Heart Rate (HR), Respiratory Rate (RR), Blood Oxygen Saturation (SpO2), Skin Temperature (Tskin), Pulse Rate (PR), International, Low-Income, Middle-Income, High-Income, Golden Hour, Post-Birth

Brief summary

The goals of this observational study is to assess whether a new advanced wireless skin sensor vital sign monitoring system can effectively monitor the vital signs of healthy newborn infants (≥ 35 weeks gestational age). The main aims of this Study are to: 1. Assess feasibility 2. Evaluate safety 3. Determine accuracy of the wireless monitoring system, compared to the standard of care wired vital sign monitoring system, immediately after delivery and for the first 2h of age in the obstetrical center under unsupervised parents' care. The newborn infants participating in the Study will have both vital sign monitoring systems placed on their chest and limb. Their vital signs will be monitored for 2h consecutively.

Detailed description

When the transition from intrauterine to extrauterine life necessitates Neonatal Resuscitation, specialized monitoring of vital signs is required. Sudden Unexpected Postnatal Collapse (SUPC) is an apnea or cardiorespiratory failure occurring in otherwise healthy near-term or term neonates, usually in the first 48 hours of age, during the initial Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC) in the obstetrical center. SUPC carries a high morbidity and mortality rate. Approximately 10 million babies do not breathe immediately after birth, and 60% require basic resuscitation interventions. Sudden Unexpected Postnatal Collapse has been estimated to occur in 2.6-133 cases per 100.000 newborns and over 50% of the cases occur following accidental suffocation, which frequently goes unrecognised by parents in the obstetrical center during unsupervised KMC. Current guidelines recommend monitoring of heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation (SpO2), and skin temperature (Tskin) during neonatal resuscitation. This is usually achieved by using wired electrodes and sensors that require expensive and large base units attached to a power supply. SUPC is a rare but largely preventable cause of neonatal mortality that deserves particular attention. Better resuscitation and prevention of SUPC might be achieved by continuous non-intrusive monitoring of vital signs immediately after delivery and while in the obstetrical center. This research will address a very important gap in care; the need for safe and accurate advanced, non-invasive, and non-intrusive wireless technologies for monitoring of vital signs immediately after birth and during the immediate postnatal care, potentially preventing cases of SUPC while in the obstetrical center. Reliable and low-cost wireless monitoring that could be used immediately after delivery would promote widespread adoption of neonatal resuscitation recommendations in low and middle income countries, improve detection of vital signs quickly after delivery and during early unsupervised KMC, and optimize neonatal care in the obstetrical centers or during hospital stay, to prevent cases of SUPC and its associated high mortality.

Interventions

DEVICEWireless skin sensors vital sign monitoring system

The wireless monitoring system will be applied to the newborn and consist of a chest sensor (Anne Arc by Sibel Inc.) and a RAD-7 (Masimo)pulse oximeter limb sensor.

DEVICEWired vital sign monitoring system

A standard ECG and SpO2 monitoring device will be applied suing the Infinity M540 monitor (Draeger, Germany). The chest sensor will be placed as per standard of care on the newborn's chest and abdomen, and the SpO2 sensor on their hands or feet.

Sponsors

Guilherme Sant'Anna, MD
Lead SponsorOTHER
Hospital Universitário da Universidade Estadual de Londrina
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Nuovo Ospedale degli Infermi
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Luzerner Kantonsspital
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
35 Weeks to 42 Weeks
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Newborns ≥35 weeks (gestational age) 2. Newborns determined to be clinically stable at delivery 3. Newborns with no skin abnormalities

Exclusion criteria

1. Newborns ≤ 35 weeks (gestational age) 2. Newborns determined to not be clinically stable at delivery 3. Newborns with Skin abnormalities

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility of using a wireless monitoring system immediately after delivery for HR.6 monthsPercentage of time for which heart rate (HR) is displayed.
Feasibility of using a wireless monitoring system immediately after delivery for RR.6 monthsPercentage of time for which respiratory rate (RR) is displayed.
Feasibility of using a wireless monitoring system immediately after delivery for SpO2.6 monthsPercentage of time for which blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) is displayed.
Feasibility of using a wireless monitoring system immediately after delivery for Tskin6 monthsPercentage of time for which skin temperature (Tskin) is displayed.
Feasibility of using a wireless monitoring system immediately after delivery - Gap occurence6 monthsOccurrence of gaps in signal detection/recordings (% and length in seconds).
Feasibility of using a wireless monitoring system immediately after delivery - Gap causes6 monthsCauses of the gaps in signal detection/recordings.
Feasibility of using a wireless monitoring system immediately after delivery - User satisfaction6 monthsDescriptive analysis of user surveys and their satisfaction with the wireless system.
Safety of using a wireless system immediately after delivery - skin score6 monthsSkin score (Neonatal Skin Condition Score) to be determined by a blinded dermatologist using de-identified pictures of the skin after removal of the sensors of each system. A "perfect" score using the NSCS is 3; the worst score is 9.
Safety of using a wireless system immediately after delivery - pain scale6 monthsPain scale (Neonatal Infant Pain Scale) to assess any discomfort or pain during the removal of the sensors, with higher scores indicating greater pain.
Safety of using a wireless system immediately after delivery - clinical event discrepancies6 monthsClinically significant events detected by the wired system (HR \< 100 bpm or SpO2 \< 80%) but missed by the wireless system.
Assess the accuracy of this wireless system - correlation coefficient.6 monthsMeasuring HR, RR, SpO2 and Tskin signals compared with the "standard of care" wired system - Correlation coefficient
Assess the accuracy of this wireless system - slope6 monthsMeasuring HR, RR, SpO2 and Tskin signals compared with the "standard of care" wired system - Slop
Assess the accuracy of this wireless system - variance accounted for6 monthsMeasuring HR, RR, SpO2 and Tskin signals compared with the "standard of care" wired system - Variance accounted for
Assess the accuracy of this wireless system - bias.6 monthsMeasuring HR, RR, SpO2 and Tskin signals compared with the "standard of care" wired system - Bias

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time between sensors placement and data display (seconds)6 monthsTo determine the time (seconds)between sensors placement and data display for each system (seconds)

Countries

Brazil, Canada, Italy, Switzerland

Contacts

CONTACTGuilherme Sant´Anna, MD, PhD
guilherme.santanna@mcgill.ca514-934-1934
CONTACTAlyssa Maximov, BSc
alyssa.maximov@muhc.mcgill.ca514-934-1934
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORGuilherme Sant'Anna, MD, PhD

The Research institute of the McGill University Health Centre

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 9, 2026