Gastro Esophageal Reflux Disease, Barrett Esophagus
Conditions
Keywords
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, Barrett's Esophagus, Barrett's Esophagus Screening, BE, GERD
Brief summary
This study plans to learn more about what patients think about screening for esophageal cancer (EAC) and Barrett's esophagus (BE); a pre-cancerous condition associated with esophageal cancer. The plan is to use this information to modify screening practices in the United States with the goal to decrease the number of people who die from esophageal cancer.
Detailed description
To achieve this goal, patient preferences for BE/EAC screening tests will be evaluated through a prospective multicenter discrete choice-based conjoint survey. Patients will choose between a series of hypothetical options and rank their priorities and what they value according to differences in benefit of detection (sensitivity), convenience (time, setting), screening related physical harms (procedural discomfort), and financial harms. By evaluating relative importance of test characteristics and patient prioritization the study will (1) define patient preferences and barriers for attributes of BE/EAC screening modalities to elicit the overall preferred test as well as differences in each attribute that informed that choice and (2) characterize differences in BE/EAC test preferences by patient sociodemographic characteristics (age, sex, race, ethnicity) and by the presence or absence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).
Interventions
BEHAVIORALPatient survey
To assess patient preferences and barriers for attributes of BE/EAC screening modalities patients will complete a survey evaluating 5 domains: benefit of detection (sensitivity), convenience (time, setting), screening related physical harms (procedural discomfort), and financial harms. Prior to distribution, the survey will be refined and pretested among a sample of 5 patients.
Sponsors
American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
University of California, Los Angeles
University of Michigan
Exact Sciences Corporation
VA Medical Center-West Los Angeles
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
University of Colorado, Denver
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 89 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Provision to sign and date the consent form. * Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of the study. * Individual has 3 or more established risk factors for BE (age \> 50 years, chronic GERD, male, white race, smoking, obesity, family history of BE/EAC).
Exclusion criteria
* Unable to consent. * Prior diagnosis of BE/EAC. * Life limiting comorbidity/ disability. * Active dementia/ cognitive impairment. * Incarcerated.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Define patient preferred BE/EAC screening test and barriers for attributes of BE/EAC screening tests | Baseline | A discrete choice-based conjoint analysis survey evaluating 5 domains: benefit of detection (sensitivity), convenience (time, setting), screening related physical harms (procedural discomfort), and financial harms will be used to determine the relative importance of BE/EAC screening test characteristics and patient priorities. Survey data will be reported in aggregate and factors and choices will be analyzed using the Fisher Exact and Mann-Whitney rank-sum tests. This approach will elicit the overall preferred test and differences in each test attribute that informed the patients choice. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Characterization of differences in BE/EAC test preferences by patient sociodemographic characteristics and by patient presence or absence of GERD | Baseline | Using the discrete choice-based conjoint analysis survey analysis, a logistic regression model of patient-specific attributes (age, sex, race, ethnicity) and by presence or absence of GERD will be used to evaluate if disparities in patient demographics or heath history impact complex decision making. |
Countries
United States
Contacts
Primary ContactAlexa DeBord, MS
Outcome results
None listed