Skip to content

Study of Transaxillary Robotic Thyroidectomy Versus Standard Open Thyroidectomy: Prospective, Comparative Single-Center Study

A Comparative Study of Transaxillary Robotic Thyroidectomy Versus Standard Open Thyroidectomy

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06693258
Acronym
CARTO
Enrollment
100
Registered
2024-11-18
Start date
2024-11-25
Completion date
2026-12-01
Last updated
2026-09-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carpal Tunnel Surgery

Brief summary

The aim of our study is to evaluate the two surgical approaches, standard thyroidectomy and robotic thyroidectomy, in terms of postoperative pain management, scar quality, quality of life, as well as the occurrence of postoperative complications (hypocalcemia, compressive cervical hematoma and nerve stimulation)

Interventions

PROCEDUREthyroidectomy by robotic surgery via axillary approach

thyroidectomy

PROCEDUREthyroidectomy by standard conventional surgery

thyroidectomy by standard conventional surgery

Sponsors

Clinique Bizet
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Prospective, Comparative, Monocentric Study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject aged over 20 years * Referred for a thyroidectomy (total or partial) * Absence of participation in another clinical study * Subject affiliated to a social security scheme or beneficiary of such a scheme * Accepts the completion of the various study questionnaires

Exclusion criteria

* Patient under 20 years of age. * Patients who have undergone combined radical cervical lymph node dissection * Patient with a postoperative wound problem * Patient with an underlying systemic disease that may influence the wound healing process * Unable to undergo medical follow-up for the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluate the post-operative quality of life at D30 between the two groupsday 30thyca-Qol

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total dysphagia score between the two groupsDay7, Day30 and 3 monthsEAT-10 scale
Quality of the scar between the two groupsday 30Vancouver scale
Assess the functional recovery of the vocal cordsday 7 and day 30fibroscopy

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 11, 2026