Skip to content

PeRfusiOn Post tHrombEcTomy (PROPHET)

PeRfusiOn Post tHrombEcTomy (PROPHET) A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06691230
Acronym
PROPHET
Enrollment
279
Registered
2024-11-15
Start date
2024-11-01
Completion date
2028-02-28
Last updated
2024-11-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke, Acute, Ischemic

Keywords

Acute ischemic stroke, Large-vessel occlusion, Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy, Flat-panel detector computed tomography perfusion imaging, Perfusion imaging

Brief summary

Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy is the standard of care for treating patients with a large-vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke. However, in more than half of these patients, remaining distal vessel occlusions limit the benefit of this therapy. Currently the detection of residual vessel occlusions and the decision for further treatment by the operator is based on the 2D digital subtraction angiography (DSA) images. However, this technique has several limitations. Recently, a new imaging technique, with the possibility to acquire 3D time-resolved perfusion images directly in the operating room was introduced (the flat-panel detector computed tomography perfusion imaging, FDCTP). It can overcome the spatial limitations of 2D DSA, but the details on clinical validation and utility of FDCTP are currently lacking.

Detailed description

This clinical investigation is planned as a multi-center, prospective, non-randomized observational study with a primary endpoint to evaluate a potential diagnostic benefit. The diagnostic tool to be studied is clinically indicated 60s Dyna CT Head Perfusion (FDCTP imaging) obtained after or during mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke. The population consists of patients with symptoms of acute ischemic stroke, who were intended to undergo mechanical thrombectomy. This means that patients who did not undergo mechanical thrombectomy and only had diagnostic angiography (e.g. physician team has decided against thrombectomy due to pre-interventional vessel reperfusion), can still be included in the study. Patients can only be included if a FDCTP was acquired immediately after thrombectomy or diagnostic angiography by the treating physician team as part of the standard clinical routine. There is no control group. The overall objective is to investigate the potential clinical use of FDCTP acquired during or shortly after the endovascular stroke treatment. Primary study objective is to evaluate in how many cases FDCTP maps reveal new, potentially relevant clinical information that may change treatment decisions. The primary research hypothesis is that the proportion of patients where FDCTP reveals new, potentially clinically relevant findings is greater than 25%. Assuming a true proportion of 33% of the primary outcome, we will need 251 patients to reach a power of 80% at a one-sided alpha of 2.5%, based on a one-sample binomial exact test. To account for a drop-out rate of 10%, we plan to recruit 279 patients.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Informed consent as documented by a signature * The patients received mechanical thrombectomy or there was the intention to perform endovascular treatment, but only diagnostic angiography was performed. * Patients received FDCTP as clinically indicated by the treating physician.

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to give consent due to insufficient knowledge of the project language * Inability to follow the clinically indicated visit at 90 days after the index stroke (e.g. patients living abroad).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Detection of New Potentially Clinically Relevant Findings on FDCTPUp to 30 days post-procedure* Any hypoperfusion on processed FDCTP maps suggesting residual vessel occlusion within the target mechanical thrombectomy territory, not noted on the 2D DSA imaging (dichotomous variable: yes versus no) * Any hypoperfusion suggestive of vessel occlusion outside the target mechanical thrombectomy territory not observed on the 2D DSA i.e., a new vessel occlusion (dichotomous variable: yes versus no) * No hypoperfusion suggestive of residual vessel occlusion on FDCTP within the target mechanical thrombectomy territory, even thought the patient has incomplete reperfusion (\<eTICI3) on the 2D DSA (dichotomous variable: yes versus no) The primary outcome of the study will be assessed as a dichotomous variable (yes versus no), derived from a compound measure of clinically relevant findings based on the three interpretations described above.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic Sensitivity of 2D DSA vs. FDCTP in Detecting Residual Vessel OcclusionUp to 30 days post-procedureProportion of patients with all detected residual vessel occlusions on FDCTP versus none or not all detected residual vessel occlusions on FDCTP (dichotomous outcome)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Prevalence of the No-Reflow Phenomenon on FDCTPUp to 30 days post-procedureProportion of patients with/without residual microvascular hypoperfusion (dichotomous variable).
Eloquence of Hypoperfused TissueUp to 30 days post-procedureHypoperfusion in the eloquent brain zones i.e. eloquent cortex (dichotomous variable: yes versus no)
Cost-effectiveness of FDCTPUp to 30 days post-procedureIncremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER, continuous variable)
Detection of Competitive Leptomeningeal Flow on FDCTPUp to 30 days post-procedureAmerican Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology Collateral Grading System (categorical variable, Score 0-4)
Concordance between FDCTP and standard imagingUp to 30 days post-procedureAssociation of findings from the FDCTP with standard cross-sectional imaging on follow-up examination at 24 hours (categorical variable: sustained reperfusion, persisting perfusion deficit, delayed reperfusion)

Countries

Switzerland

Contacts

Primary ContactJohannes Kaesmacher, Prof.
nctu@insel.ch+41 31 66 4 05 38
Backup ContactSeraina Beyeler, PhD
seraina.beyeler@insel.ch+41 31 632 39 70

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026