Skip to content

Exercise Based on Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation in Older Individuals

Physical Functioning Adaptations Following a Resisted Functional Exercise Program Based on the Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Concept in Older Individuals: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06690944
Enrollment
26
Registered
2024-11-15
Start date
2023-03-23
Completion date
2024-06-03
Last updated
2024-11-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dynapenia, Functional Disability, Sarcopenia in Elderly

Keywords

Frailty, Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation, Gait, Balance, Sit-Stand, Functionality

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial was to determine whether an intervention using resisted sit-to-stand and walking exercises with Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) techniques improved gait and sit-to-stand in older individuals with poor functional capacity compared to a control group that performed the same activities, but without manual resistance. The main questions it aimed to answer were: Did an exercise program based on the PNF concept improve functional capacity and strength performance? Was there a difference between an exercise program with or without PNF techniques on functional capacity and strength in older adults? Researchers compared the effects of an exercise program based on the PNF concept to a similar exercise training without manual resistance on functional capacity and strength performance. Participants participated in an intervention using resisted sit-to-stand and walking exercises with or without PNF and performed functional capacity and strength tests at the beginning and end of the intervention.

Detailed description

The proposal consisted of investigating an exercise intervention based on the Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation concept (PFNG), compared to a control group (CG), which performed the same exercises as PNFG under a therapist's supervision, but without resistance imposed by the therapist's hands as in PFNG, in older individuals. Before data collection, individuals participated in a familiarization procedure for each test. Each specific test was conducted on the same equipment with identical participant/equipment positioning. Functional assessment and intervention were conducted at the participants' residences. The CG intervention consisted of the same activities carried out in the PNFG during Stages 1 and 2, for the same amount of minutes, sessions, and weeks. However, the CG intervention did not include specific techniques and basic principles (i.e., approximation and optimal resistance) and procedures of the PNF concept. The activities were instructed and supervised by a trained professional through verbal commands. The professional was in a stand-by assistant position to prevent accidents. Each intervention lasted 30 minutes and took place twice a week, for 4 weeks, totaling 8 meetings. The interventions were supervised by researchers blinded to pre-intervention assessment results and randomly assigned for both PNF and control groups. The researchers responsible for the interventions were physical therapists with basic IPNFA® (International Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Association) instruction.

Interventions

OTHERProprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation

The following basic principles and procedures were emphasized when applying the techniques: manual contact, resistance, approximation, verbal commands, and therapist's body mechanics. During stages 1 and 2 of the intervention, the amount of PNF optimal resistance used was necessary to maintain a stable and safe position, with good body alignment, in a manner that produced coordinated movements to generate appropriate motor learning.

OTHERPhysical exercise without proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation control group

The physical exercise without proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation control group (CG) intervention consisted of the same activities carried out in the proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) group during Stages 1 and 2, during the same amount of minutes, sessions, and weeks; however, CG intervention did not include specific techniques and basic principles (i.e. approximation and optimal resistance) and procedures of the PNF concept. The activities were instructed and supervised by a trained professional through verbal command. The professional was at stand-by assistant position to prevent accidents.

Sponsors

Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Short Physical Performance Battery score lower than 10 points.

Exclusion criteria

* Neurodegenerative diseases; * Illnesses contraindicating exercise (e.g., uncontrolled arrhythmias, acute myocardial infarction); * Unstable medical condition.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Short Physical Performance BatteryBaseline and immediately after the interventionShort Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) includes usual walking speed over 4 meters, balance, and five times sit-to-stand. The sum of the three individual categorical scores yielded the final SPPB score, which ranged from 0 (worst) to 12 (best).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Timed Up and GoBaseline and immediately after the interventionThe Timed Up and Go test consists of measuring the time required to perform the task of standing from a chair, walking 3 meters, turning, going back, and sitting down on the chair.
Handgrip strengthBaseline and immediately after the interventionHandgrip strength is measured using a hand dynamometer (Jamar Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer). The dynamometer is squeezed twice with each hand while the participant is seated. The upper arm is positioned close to the body with the elbow at a 90° angle. The higher score is used, provided the difference does not exceed 10%; otherwise, a third measurement is taken.
Gait speedBaseline and immediately after the interventionGait speed is assessed through a 4-meter walking test. Participants are asked to walk 4 meters at their usual speed on a horizontal walkway.
Static balanceBaseline and immediately after the interventionStatic balance is assessed through 10-second hold parallel feet, semi-tandem, and tandem positions. Participants progress to the hardest test only if they succeed in the easiest.
Sit-To-StandBaseline and immediately after the interventionThe sit-to-stand test consists of the time spent standing from a chair 5 times.

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026