Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Leadless Pacemakers Versus Left Bundle Area Pacing - A Preliminary Exploration

Efficacy and Safety of Leadless Pacemakers Versus Left Bundle Area Pacing - A Preliminary Exploration

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06690333
Acronym
COMPAREPACE
Enrollment
75
Registered
2024-11-15
Start date
2024-11-05
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2025-05-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

AV Node Disease, Pacemaker Implantation

Keywords

pacemaker, MICRA AV, Leadless pacemaker, left bundle area pacing

Brief summary

This is a prospective, randomized controlled (1:1) multicenter trial. The pilot study will be conducted up to three clinical sites in the United States. The primary purpose of this study is to compare the overall safety and efficacy between the leadless pacemaker and left bundle area pacing.

Detailed description

This is a prospective, randomized controlled (1:1) multicenter trial. The pilot study will be conducted up to three clinical sites in the United States. This study is designed to compare the safety and effectiveness of two types of pacemaker treatments: leadless pacemakers and left bundle area pacing. Patients who's heart rhythm indicate a degree of heart block that slows the heart beat and decreases the amount of blood the heart is pumping to the rest of the body will be identified by physicians to participate. This study seeks to improve our understanding of heart rhythm disorders to allow us to provide the best treatment for our patients.

Interventions

DEVICEPacemaker

Transvenous pacemaker with left bundle area pacing

Sponsors

Medtronic
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
NCH Healthcare System, Inc. dba Naples Comprehensive Health and dba NCH
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Clinical Events Committee is masked

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age \> 18 2. Planned for: 1. permanent pacemaker implantation for AV node disease (first, second or third degree), OR 2. post-TAVR patient requiring permanent pacemaker implantation 3. Preserved ejection fraction \> 50% 4. Preserved sinus node function 5. Willingness to adhere to study restrictions and comply with all post-procedural follow-up requirements 6. Life expectancy \> 1 year 7. Female subject of childbearing potential is not pregnant, not breast feeding, does not plan to be pregnant during the course of the study, and agrees to use a highly effective contraceptive method (i.e. IUD, birth control, vasectomized partner, sexual abstinence, etc.) during the course of the study. 8. Subject has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provision and has provided written informed consent, approved by the IRB

Exclusion criteria

1. Sinus node dysfunction, anticipating atrial pacing or persistent atrial fibrillation 2. Anatomical restriction for either MICRA or transvenous pacing such as 1. Access vein occlusion or thrombosis 2. previous radiation therapy at insertion site 3. inferior vena cava filter 3. Endstage renal disease (ESRD)/on dialysis 4. Dementia (inability to give consent) 5. Moderate to Severe or Severe Tricuspid valve regurgitation 6. Moderate to Severe or Severe Mitral valve regurgitation 7. History of mitral or tricuspid valve surgery 8. Preexisting implanted pacemaker or ICD or lead 9. Subject is allergic to titanium 10. Life expectancy \< 1 year 11. Recurrent or high risk of infections 12. Active malignancy requiring systemic chemotherapy or local chest radiation 13. Subject has myocardial infarction, unstable angina, cerebrovascular accident, or heart failure admission within 3 months of the baseline visit 14. CABG, valve surgery or PCI within the last 3 months except TAVR 15. Other major cardiac surgery within the last 6 months 16. Persistent and permanent atrial fibrillation diagnosed by a healthcare provider 17. NYHA class 3 or 4 Heart Failure Additional post-TAVR

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy & Safety12 monthsThe composite of: 1. procedural success 2. freedom from serious device-related complications at one year 3. freedom from heart failure or drop in ejection fraction below 50%.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Procedure timefrom procedure start to procedure endmeasured in minutes
Device longevityat 12 month follow updevice longevity as noted on interrogation reports

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactDinesh Sharma, MD
dinesh.sharma@nchmd.org(239) 624-8113
Backup ContactKathy Byrd, RN
Kathy.Byrd@nchmd.org(239)624-8113

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026