Skip to content

Surgery Alone Verus Sugery Combined with Dose-reduced Radiotherapy for Newly Diagnosed Stage I Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Endoscopic Nasopharyngectomy Combined with Retropharyngeal Lymph Node Dissection Plus Low-dose Radiotherapy Versus Bilateral Upper Neck Dissection for Newly Diagnosed Stage I Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06688760
Enrollment
86
Registered
2024-11-14
Start date
2023-11-01
Completion date
2028-11-01
Last updated
2024-11-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Radiotherapy, Surgery

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic nasopharyngectomy combined with retropharyngeal lymph nodes dissection plus bilateral upper neck lymph node dissection or plus postoperative low-dose radiotherapy in newly diagnosed stage Ⅰ nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Detailed description

At present, the newly diagnosed non metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma has achieved good therapeutic effect under the treatment scheme of intensity modulated radiotherapy. The 5-year survival rate of the newly diagnosed stage Ⅰ nasopharyngeal carcinoma was more than 95%. But at the same time, all patients receiving radical radiotherapy will experience different degrees of acute or chronic radiation injury, which will affect the quality of life of patients to varying degrees. For stage Ⅰ nasopharyngeal carcinoma with the primary lesion confined to the nasopharyngeal mucosa and without regional lymph node metastasis, in theory, the primary lesion can be removed by minimally invasive surgery without preventive treatment of cervical lymph nodes. Our previous research results showed that endoscopic surgery could achieved similar survival outcomes but less adverse events than radiotherapy for Stage Ⅰ nasopharyngeal carcinoma with short diameter of retropharyngeal lymph nodes\<0.4cm or short diameter of cervical lymph nodes\<0.6 and negative PET/CT findings. However, if there is the same results for all stage I NPC patients is still unclear. Therefore, this study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic nasopharyngectomy combined with retropharyngeal lymph node dissection combined with low-dose radiotherapy or bilateral upper neck lymph node dissection compared with conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy. When the patients participated in this study, the stage ⅠNPC patient of experimental group 1 received endoscopic nasopharyngectomy combined with retropharyngeal lymph node dissection and low-dose radiotherapy. Low dose radiotherapy target area: CTV1 (tumor bed area); For the primary lesion with negative margin but less than 3mm, the margin area should be included; For patients with extracapsular invasion of lymph nodes, the extracapsular invasion area should be included; It should also include all cervical lymph nodes located above the cricoid cartilage detected by CT/MRI, regardless of size; CTV2: low risk infiltration area. The prescription dose of intensity modulated radiotherapy: CTV1:36.00gy/15fr/2.40gy; CTV2:30.00gy/15fr/2.00gy. The patients in the stage Ⅰ in the experimental group 2 underwent endoscopic nasopharynx resection combined with retropharyngeal lymph node resection and bilateral upper neck lymph node dissection, without radiotherapy or chemotherapy after surgery.

Interventions

PROCEDUREEndoscopic nasopharyngectomy combine Retropharyngeal lymphadenectomy and Low Dose Radiotherapy

in experimental arm 1

PROCEDUREEndoscopic nasopharyngectomy combine Retropharyngeal lymphadenectomy and Double upper neck lymph node dissection

in experimental arm 2

Sponsors

Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
CollaboratorOTHER
Sun Yat-sen University
CollaboratorOTHER
Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Huazhong University of Science and Technology Union Hospital (Nanshan Hospital)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
CollaboratorOTHER
First People's Hospital of Foshan
CollaboratorOTHER
Zhongshan People's Hospital, Guangdong, China
CollaboratorOTHER
Ming-Yuan Chen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria: * Performance Status Score 0-1 points. * Non-keratinized carcinoma of the nasopharynx (differentiated or undifferentiated, i.e., WHO type II or III) confirmed histologically and/or cytologically. * According to the UICC/AJCC eighth edition staging, the patient is defined as T1N0M0 stage I. * Adequate organ function: WBC ≥ 4×10\^9 /L, NEUT ≥ 2×10\^6 /L, HGB ≥ 9 g/dL, PLT count ≥ 100×10\^9/L, TBIL ≤1.5 ULN, ALT ≤3 ULN, AST ≤3 ULN, ALP ≤3 ULN, ALB ≥ 3 g/dL, INR or APTT≤1.5 ULN, Scr ≤1.5 ULN or Ccr ≥ 60 mL/min. * Informed Concent signed with willingness to obey the follow-up, treatment, examination and any other programs according to the research protocol.

Exclusion criteria

* Diagnosed as recurrent or distant metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma or together with any other malignancy. * Suffering severe organ dysfunction or physical disorder which could not tolerate surgery or radiotherapy. * Unable to cooperate with regular follow-up due to psychological, social, domestic or geological reasons. * During pregnancy or lactation. * Other patients that the chief physician considered as illegal for this trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Local Regional Relapse-Free Survival (LRRFS)2 yearsThe LRRFS is evaluated and calculated from the date of random assignment until the day of first local regional relapse or until the date of the last follow-up visit.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival (OS)2 yearsThe OS was defined as the duration from the date of random assignment to the date of death from any cause or censored at the date of the last follow-up.
Score of QLQ-C302 yearsScore of survival quality according to the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) before treatment, during treatment, after treatment and follow up.
Distant Metastasis-Free Survival (DMFS)2 yearsThe DMFS is evaluated and calculated from the date of random assignment until the day of first distant metastases or until the date of the last follow-up visit.
The incidence of serious complications2 yearsCommon Adverse Event Evaluation Criteria (CTCAE) version 5.0 evaluates acute and late-stage subjective toxicity reactions.
Score of H&N 352 yearsScore of survival quality according to the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30 and H&N 35) before treatment, during treatment, after treatment and follow up.
Incidence of acute postoperative complications2 weeksThe incidence of acute postoperative complications.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)2 yearsThe PFS was defined as the duration from the date of random assignment to the date of disease progression or censored at the date of the last follow-up.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactMing-Yuan Chen, MD,PhD
chmingy@email.sysu.edu.cn+8613903052650
Backup ContactYou-Ping Liu, PhD
liuyp78@email.sysu.edu.cn+8613751763276

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026