Skip to content

Role of ACTG2 Variants in Smooth Muscle Determination and Function in Pediatric Intestinal Pseudo-obstruction.

Role of ACTG2 Variants in Smooth Muscle Determination and Function in Pediatric Intestinal Pseudo-obstruction.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06687564
Acronym
SMOOTH-PIPO
Enrollment
4
Registered
2024-11-13
Start date
2026-02-04
Completion date
2032-02-03
Last updated
2026-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

PIPO

Keywords

PIPO, CIPO, ACTG2, pseudo-obstruction, organoid, iPS, Pediatric Intestinal Pseudo-Obstruction, Chronic Intestinal Pseudo-obstruction

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to describe the transcriptional impact of R178, R257, R40 or A136 variants of the ACTG2 gene on iPS differentiation mechanisms up to organoids derived from PIPO patient samples versus those derived from control / WT patients (generation of IPS from cultured cell lines), at different stages of their experimental ex vivo development.

Detailed description

Recruited patients will be sampled during a consultation: a blood sample and a biopsy will be taken directly from the patient. Once these samples have been taken, they will be cultured to be reprogrammed into iPS cells, then grown and differentiated into intestinal organoids. Various experiments will be carried out (as described in the outcomes) to identify at molecular, cellular and tissue level the mechanisms altered in patients with an R178, R257, R40 or A136 variant, assessing their consequence(s) on the development and functionality of the digestive mesenchyme.

Interventions

PROCEDUREBiopsy

A skin biopsy and a blood sample will be taken to culture the iPS cells and intestinal organoids.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Grenoble
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Experimental, descriptive, prospective, non-randomized, controlled, comparative, monocentric in recruitment but multicentric study in procedures and analyses.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

PIPO Population: 1. Minor or adult patient ≥ 4 years of age 2. Patient with PIPO before age 18 3. Male or female 4. Patient with PIPO meeting at least 2 of the ESPGHAN criteria (Thapar et al 2018) and carrying the R178, R257, R40 or A136 mutation of the ACTG2 gene. 5. Patient whose assent has been obtained and whose legal guardians have given their written informed consent 6. Patient affiliated to the French Social Security system or benefiting from an equivalent plan WT population: \- iPS cell lines MS573 or WT8288 or 202CT or SD378M, from the Nantes University Hospital biological collection and generated from samples from control patients without POIC who have consented to donate their samples.

Exclusion criteria

PIPO population : 1. Patients with a history of radiotherapy treatment 2. Patient with lymphocyte lineage damage

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Description of the transcriptional impact of R178, R257, R40 or A136 variants of the ACTG2 geneAt different stages of their experimental ex vivo development (mesenchymal progenitors, determined smooth muscle cells, differentiated smooth muscle cells and 3D organization of smooth muscle) through study completion, an average of 5 yearsDifference in transcript expression (%) in RNASeq transcriptomic analysis between samples carrying the R178, R257, R40 or A136 variants of the ACTG2 gene on the differentiation mechanisms of iPS up to organoids derived from PIPO patient samples versus those derived from control patients

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluate the impact of R178, R257, R40 or A136 variants of the ACTG2 gene on gastrointestinal contractile function between mutant versus WT organoids.At different stages of their experimental ex vivo development (mesenchymal progenitors, determined smooth muscle cells, differentiated smooth muscle cells and 3D organization of smooth muscle) an average of 5 yearsDifference (%) in isometric contraction force between mutant versus WT organoids by electrical stimulation and specific agonist.
Evaluate the immunofluorescence labeling differential between mutant and WT cells from IPS and organoidsAt different stages of their experimental ex vivo development (mesenchymal progenitors, determined smooth muscle cells, differentiated smooth muscle cells and 3D organization of smooth muscle) an average of 5 yearsDifference in fluorescence (%) between mutant and WT cells as cell stages from iPS to organoids
Evaluate the impact of R178, R257, R40 or A136 mutations of the ACTG2 gene on the actin network of fibroblasts derived from skin samples of diseased patients versus those of WTpatients.At different stages of their experimental ex vivo development (mesenchymal progenitors, determined smooth muscle cells, differentiated smooth muscle cells and 3D organization of smooth muscle) an average of 5 yearsDifference in actin network labeling by immunofluorescence (%) between skin fibroblasts from PIPO and WT patients.
Evaluate the effect of reversion of the R178, R257, R40 or A136 mutation versus WT on functionality and contractility during differentiation of cells into organoids.At different stages of their experimental ex vivo development (mesenchymal progenitors, determined smooth muscle cells, differentiated smooth muscle cells and 3D organization of smooth muscle) an average of 5 yearsDifference in isometric contraction strength (%) between mutant versus WT versus revertant organoids via specific agonist and electrical stimulation.
Assessing the potential of a chemical library to correct the phenotypeAt different stages of their experimental ex vivo development (mesenchymal progenitors, determined smooth muscle cells, differentiated smooth muscle cells and 3D organization of smooth muscle) an average of 5 yearsIdentification of molecules inducing a significant difference in isometric contraction force (%) between treated mutant organoids, untreated mutant organoids and treated and untreated WT

Countries

France

Contacts

CONTACTJohn Rendu, Dr
jrendu@chu-grenoble.fr0476765573
CONTACTMandy Leger
mleger@chu-grenoble.fr0476768410

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 28, 2026