Skip to content

Efficacy of L-PRF Against Deproteinized Bovine Mineralized Bone (DBBM)

Efficacy of Platelet- and Leukocyte-rich Fibrin (L-PRF) in Reducing Healing Time in Sinus Lift Combined with Deproteinized Bovine Mineralized Bone (DBBM): Randomized Clinical Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06686836
Enrollment
24
Registered
2024-11-13
Start date
2022-06-22
Completion date
2024-04-17
Last updated
2024-11-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients with Posterior Maxillary Atrophy and Need for Sinus Lift Surgery to Allow Implant Placement

Keywords

Posterior maxillary atrophy; Dental implants; Sinus lift; Bone grafting; Platelet-rich fibrin; Alveolar ridge augmentation; Bone regeneration; Bone substitutes

Brief summary

Objective: The main objective of this study is to evaluate whether the use of L-PRF combined with deproteinized bovine mineralized bone (DBBM; BioOss, Geistlich Pharma®) reduces healing time, through histomorphometric analysis using bone biopsies after maxillary sinus elevation versus the use of deproteinized bovine mineralized bone (DBBM) alone. Materials and methods: 24 patients with posterior maxillary atrophy (residual bone height \<5mm without need for vertical regeneration) and need for sinus lift surgery to allow implant placement were treated ,12 DBBM (control group) 12 L-PRF block (Test group). At 4 months after sinus lift, a biopsy was taken and implants were placed with submerged healing. After 6 months, the second surgical phase was performed and another biopsy was taken. The bone samples collected were analyzed histologically and histomorphometrically. Patients received prosthetic restorations after 9 months and were followed up at 12 months. Volumetric changes were analyzed at 4 and 12 months.

Detailed description

The study was a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT), with a parallel design. Patients requiring an open sinus lift procedure before implant placement. For the procedure it was use two types of filler, L-PRF block (test group) and DBBM alone (control group). All patients were randomized and assigned to each of the study groups through a computer-generated randomization. The primary outcome was percentage of new bone formed after treatment by histological and histomorphometric measurement of biopsies (%NeoformedBone=(Regenerated bone/total area)x100) at 4 and 6 months.

Interventions

PROCEDURESinus lift augmentation with bone substitute (Bio-Oss)

A maxillary sinus lift augmentation was performed with a lateral window approach that was filled with a bone substitute (Bio-Oss®) and covered with a collagen membrane (Bio-Guide®).At 4 months after sinus lift, a biopsy was taken and implants (Starumann®) were placed with submerged healing. After 6 months, the second surgical phase was performed and another biopsy was taken. The bone samples collected were analyzed histologically and histomorphometrically.

PROCEDUREOpen sinus lift surgery lift using Platelet- and leukocyte-rich fibrin (L-PRF) mixed with a bone substitute (Bio-Oss®(Geistlich AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland)) - L-PRF Block

A maxillary sinus lift augmentation was performed with a lateral window approach that was filled using Platelet- and leukocyte-rich fibrin (L-PRF) mixed with a bone substitute (Bio-Oss®) and covered with a collagen membrane (Bio-Guide®) (L-PRF block). L-PRF block will be performed as described by Cortellini et al. 2018. L-PRF membranes are cut into small pieces and mixed with Bio-Oss® at a ratio of 2 membranes / 0.5 g biomaterial. Pieces of the block will be removed and compacted in the sinus cavity until it is filled. At 4 months after sinus lift, a biopsy was taken and implants (Starumann®) were placed with submerged healing. After 6 months, the second surgical phase was performed and another biopsy was taken. The bone samples collected were analyzed histologically and histomorphometrically.

Sponsors

Straumanngroup
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Geistlich Pharma AG
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Santiago de Compostela
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

The study compared two groups: one receiving DBBM alone (control) and the other receiving a combination of DBBM and an L-PRF block (test group).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients \>18 years * Presence of oral health (periodontally healthy or periodontitis treated), with a BoP \<20% and PI \<20%. * Systemically healthy, with no disease that might contraindicate oral surgery. * Non-smokers or smokers of \<10 cig/day. * Need to place implants in postero-superior sector with a residual bone height of \< 5mm (no need for vertical regeneration). * More than 3 months since tooth extraction in the treatment area. * Absence of sinus pathology.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who, due to systemic conditions, blood extraction is not possible. * Medication that may interfere with bone metabolism (e.g. corticosteroids, bisphosphonates). * History of radiotherapy. * Pregnant and/or breastfeeding women.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of new bone formed4 and 6 months after treatmentMeasured by histological and histomorphometric analysis of biopsies at 4 and 6 months after sinus lift surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of remaining material (%)4 and 6 months after treatmentMeasured by histology analysis at 4 and 6 months;
Volumetric changes of regenerated bonebaseline, 4 and 12 months after treatmentMeasured in millimeters according to CBCT at 4 and 12 months after maxillary sinus lift in apico-coronal and bucco-lingual orientation
Implant stability4 and 6 months after treatmentMesured ISQ (\>65N) at the time of implant placement and in the second surgical phase before connecting the abutment to the implant).
Implant success12 months after treatmentAccording to the criteria described by Misch,2008

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026