Skip to content

The Impact of Supermicrosurgery Intervention on Patients with Lower Extremity Lymphedema Using Groin-Only Approach Lymphaticovenous Anastomosis

Groin-Only Lymphaticovenous Anastomosis for Lower Extremity Lymphoedema: a Retrospective Cohort Propensity-Score Matched Analysis of a Novel Supermicrosurgical Concept

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06685926
Enrollment
189
Registered
2024-11-13
Start date
2015-09-30
Completion date
2024-09-30
Last updated
2024-11-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lymphedema, Lymphedema of Leg

Keywords

propensity score matching, LVA, supermicrosurgery, lymphaticovenous anastomosis, lymphovenous bypass

Brief summary

This study employs a propensity score-matched analysis to compare the treatment outcomes, focusing on percentage volume reduction between the conventional multi-incision lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) technique and the novel single groin incision LVA technique in patients with unilateral lower extremity lymphoedema.

Detailed description

Lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA), a surgical technique that connects lymphatic vessels (LVs) to adjacent veins, has demonstrated efficacy in alleviating lymphedema by enabling the drainage of stagnant lymphatic fluid. Conventional LVA treatment for lower extremity lymphoedema (LEL) has favored distal, multiple incisions in the lower leg due to the denser and more superficial distribution of LVs and recipient veins in the distal regions. Based on the recent advancement in the understaning of lymphosomes and the role of antegrade lymph flow, a shift to more proximal LVA around the groin region for LEL could be theoretically advantagous, but its clinical efficacy compared to conventional distal LVA remains underexplored.

Interventions

PROCEDURESupermicrosurgical LVA, Groin Approach Only (lymphatic vessel to recipient vien lumen-to-lumen anastomosis)
PROCEDURESupermicrosurgical LVA, Conventional Multiple Access Approach Only (lymphatic vessel to recipient vien lumen-to-lumen anastomosis)

Sponsors

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients diagnosed with lymphatic-related diseases to the lower extremity * Patients who is undergoing LVA for unilateral lower-limb lymphedema.

Exclusion criteria

* Primary lymphedema * Bilateral lower limb lymphedema * History of previous treatment for lymphedema (LVA, vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT), liposuction, or excisional therapy such as the Charles procedure) - Those that were lost to follow-up. * Patients who recieved both LVA to the groin site and non-groin site.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Volume change after LVA6 and 12 monthsThe primary endpoint is limb volume change at 6 and 12 months after intervention, measured using magnetic resonance volumetry.

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026