Peri-implantitis
Conditions
Keywords
Er:YAG laser, Debridment, peri-implantitis
Brief summary
In this study, mechanical debridement group, Er:YAG laser group and diode laser group will be compared in terms of reducing peri-implant sulcus depth in the treatment of peri-implantitis.
Interventions
To be applied 1 times (0. days)
To be applied 3 times
To be applied 3 times
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Four group: * Peri-implant healty * Mechanical curette * Er:YAG laser * Diyot laser
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Probing depth of 4-6 mm, bone loss of at least 2 mm on X-ray and presence of inflammatory symptoms in soft tissue * No systemic disease that may affect the outcome of the treatment * Patients with healthy periodontium or patients with completed periodontal treatment * Individuals at least 6 months after prosthesis loading on the implant * Individuals who do not require further surgery for the treatment of peri-implantitis * Implants with at least 2 mm keratised gingiva * Individuals aged 40-60 years
Exclusion criteria
* Individuals undergoing radiation therapy * Individuals who smoke and drink alcohol * Individuals in pregnancy or lactation * Individuals who have received antibiotic treatment in the last three months * Individuals with parafunctional habits
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Probing depth, clinical attachment loss | sixth month | Measurement will be made with a periodontal probe. The unit of measurement is millimetre. The primary outcome measures are interrelated. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| gingival index, plaque index, sulcus blood index | sixth month | The 0,1,2,3 point system for index measurements is currently used in periodontology. These scores will be used in secondary outcome measures. |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)