Skip to content

Impact of Active Breaks in Elementary School Children

Impact of Active Breaks in the Classroom on Physical, Mathematical and Cognitive Performance in Elementary School Children

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06684808
Enrollment
159
Registered
2024-11-12
Start date
2023-12-01
Completion date
2024-05-31
Last updated
2024-11-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Physical Performance, Cognitive Performance, Academic Acheivement

Keywords

active breaks, children, academic achievement, physical activity, school time

Brief summary

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effects of 12 weeks of Active Breaks on motor, academic and cognitive performance in elementary school children.

Detailed description

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effects of 12 weeks of Active Breaks on motor, academic and cognitive performance in elementary school children. 159 children were recruited: 92 for experimental group (EG) and 67 for Control Group(CG); after the baseline assessment, the EG classes were randomly assigned into three experimental groups: creativity AB (CREAT; n = 30 ), fitness AB (FIT; n =31 ) and combined AB (COM; n= 31 ) . Specifically, the EG carried out an active break intervention for 12 weeks during curricular time, repeated twice a day, with the duration of 10 minutes, three times a week. CG did not performed any type of active breaks.

Interventions

OTHERFitness

The Fitness group engaged in active breaks aimed at improving cardiovascular efficiency. These breaks were designed to provide moderate to vigorous physical activity, incorporating both strength and aerobic exercises such as squats, jumping jacks, lunges, and running in place. Children were instructed to imitate the teacher's movements.

OTHERCreative

The Creative group participated in active breaks that combined cognitive-creative and physical demands, incorporating activities like improvisations, dramatizations of events or short stories, simulation, and imitation games. These activities aimed to stimulate the creative process and enhance emotional expression within environmental constraints. Constraints, set by the teacher-such as specific rules, partner positioning, or speed of execution-limited movement options, encouraging students to explore new solutions to complete each task.

The Combined group took active breaks by combining the Fitness protocol in the first break and the Creative protocol in the second.

OTHERControl

Regular physical activity at school during the weeks.

Sponsors

Alessandra di Cagno
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Giuseppe Calcagno
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Giovanni Fiorilli
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Andrea Buonsenso
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Molise
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 8 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* attending second and third elementary classroom

Exclusion criteria

* to be free from injury, which could preclude the PA practice.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment Test of Calculation Skills AC.MT 6-11after 12 weeksAC-MT 6-11 test proposes tests to ascertain the level of learning of calculus, basic assessment, and problem solving
Heightafter 12 weeks
Weightafter 12 weeks
Leaps forward on one footafter 12 weeksHopping forward on one foot along a line for 10 meters. This test consists of 4 items (what to do), each with specific execution criteria (what to observe). Generally, these criteria represent a mature execution pattern for that skill. Children receive 1 point if they perform the item correctly and 0 points if not
Side Gallopafter 12 weeksGallop sideways for 10 meters. This test consists of 4 items (what to do), each with specific execution criteria (what to observe). Generally, these criteria represent a mature execution pattern for that skill. Children receive 1 point if they perform the item correctly and 0 points if not
Alternating forward hops on one footafter 12 weeksHopping forward by alternating the supporting foot for 10 meters. This test consists of 4 items (what to do), each with specific execution criteria (what to observe). Generally, these criteria represent a mature execution pattern for that skill. Children receive 1 point if they perform the item correctly and 0 points if not
Throwing a ball with one handafter 12 weeksThrow the ball against the wall 10 meters away. This test consists of 4 items (what to do), each with specific execution criteria (what to observe). Generally, these criteria represent a mature execution pattern for that skill. Children receive 1 point if they perform the item correctly and 0 points if not
Receiving with the hands a thrown ballafter 12 weeksCatch the ball on the fly from a distance of 5 meters. This test consists of 4 items (what to do), each with specific execution criteria (what to observe). Generally, these criteria represent a mature execution pattern for that skill. Children receive 1 point if they perform the item correctly and 0 points if not
Hitting the ball with a tennis racketafter 12 weekshitting the ball from a distance of 5 meters. This test consists of 4 items (what to do), each with specific execution criteria (what to observe). Generally, these criteria represent a mature execution pattern for that skill. Children receive 1 point if they perform the item correctly and 0 points if not
Long jump from a standing startafter 12 weeksPerform as long a forward jump as possible starting from a standing position.
Fast shuttle run 10x5mafter 12 weeksRun 5 m for 10 times at the highest possible speed
Reynolds Interference Task (RIT) testafter 12 weeksMeasurement of complex processing speed

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026