Skip to content

Comparison Between Two Different Healing Abutments in Single Posterior Implants

Comparison of Two Different Healing Abutments in Single Posterior Implants: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06682559
Enrollment
24
Registered
2024-11-12
Start date
2024-11-01
Completion date
2025-10-01
Last updated
2025-08-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Implants, Dental Implants, Single-tooth

Keywords

Dental implants, single missing posterior teeth, peri-implant soft tissues

Brief summary

The aim of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate the volumetric analysis of peri-implant soft tissues after 3 months of the use of a prefabricated healing abutment with scan peg in comparison to customized healing abutment.

Detailed description

Volumetric analysis of peri-implant soft tissues after 3 months of the use of a prefabricated healing abutment with scan peg with convex emergence profile in comparison to customized healing abutment with concave emergence profile.

Interventions

OTHERPrefabricated healing abutment with scan peg

12 participants will receive single posterior implants by fully guided implant protocol followed by placement of prefabricated healing abutment with scan peg having convex emergence profile

12 participants will receive single posterior implants by fully guided implant protocol followed by placement of custom healing abutment having concave emergence profile

Sponsors

Alexandria University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Statistician

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients who are classified as ASA I or II physical status and require mandibular single implants (single missing mandibular posterior teeth) with: 1. Proper bone height and width. 2. Adequate zone of keratinized tissue (at least 2 mm)

Exclusion criteria

* Any systematic disease as uncontrolled diabetes mellitus or metabolic bone diseases * Pregnancy and Lactation * A history of head and neck radiation treatment. * Chronic periodontal diseases. * Poor oral hygiene (Silness-Löe plaque index score 2 and 3) * Parafunctional habits.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Measurement of peri-implant soft tissues volume3 monthsEach participant will undergo volumetric analysis of peri-implant soft tissues after 3 months healing either after using prefabricated healing abutment with scan peg in comparison to customized healing abutment using a 3D meteorology software (GOM inspect). It will be measured in millimeter cube

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026