Healthy Internet Use, Internet Addiction, Problematic Internet Use
Conditions
Keywords
adolescent, problematic internet use, nursing, model, healthy internet use
Brief summary
The study aimed to investigate the effect of a nursing care program based on the Care Bag Theory for Healthy Internet Use in Adolescents (CHIA) on adolescents' problematic internet use, self-regulation, family relationships, and coping skills.
Detailed description
This study constitutes a part of the doctoral thesis titled "Development of a Nursing Intervention Model Specific to Problematic Internet Use in Adolescents"
Interventions
BEHAVIORALA nursing care program based on the Care Bag Theory for Healthy Internet Use in Adolescents (CHIA)
A nursing care program based on the Care Bag Theory for Healthy Internet Use in Adolescents (CHIA) The nursing care program based on the CHIA model is designed for adolescents with problematic internet use. The program is grounded in the concepts of the draft model. It consists of eight sessions, each expected to last 40-50 minutes. One session will be held per week. The first session includes introductions and an overview of the program, the second session aims to strengthen the adolescent's motivation for change, the third session focuses on improving the adolescent's self-control skills, the fourth session aims to enhance family functionality, the fifth session helps develop offline activities to replace internet use, the sixth and seventh sessions work on developing coping skills, and the eighth session includes the evaluation and termination of the program.
Sponsors
Akdeniz University
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Voluntarily agreeing to participate in the study, * Being between the ages of 12-18, * Receiving outpatient follow-up at the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Clinic, * Having a Problematic Internet Use (PIU) issue (PIU is assessed according to the criteria by the doctors at the clinic. The doctors refer adolescents who meet the criteria. These criteria are as follows: a) using the internet for longer than planned, b) experiencing withdrawal symptoms when unable to access the internet, c) failing to control internet usage, d) being excessively preoccupied with the internet, e) losing interest in offline hobbies, f) a desire to use the internet more, g) continuing excessive internet use despite knowing it negatively affects their life, h) using the internet to escape problems, i) lying about internet use).
Exclusion criteria
* Having a speech, hearing, or self-expression impairment, * Having received or currently receiving professional support related to PIU.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Problematic Internet Use Scale-Adolescent (PIUS-A) | Data will be collected two times: pre-intervention and immediately post-intervention. | The scale consists of 27 items and is of a five-point Likert type. The lowest possible score on the scale is 27, and the highest score is 135. Higher scores on the scale indicate that adolescents' problematic internet use has increased and become unhealthy. The PIUS-A scale has three subscales: negative consequences of internet use, excessive use, and social benefit/social comfort. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The Adolescent Self Regulatory Inventory (ASRI) | Data will be collected two times: pre-intervention and immediately post-intervention. | The scale consists of 32 items and has two subscales: 'self-control success' and 'self-control failure.' The self-control success subscale contains 18 items, while the self-control failure subscale contains 14 items. The scale uses a four-point Likert-type rating. The scale is used to calculate the total score. The lowest possible score on the ASRI is 32, and the highest score is 128. A higher score on the scale indicates that the adolescent's self-control skills are good. |
| Kidcope | Data will be collected two times: pre-intervention and immediately post-intervention. | The scale consists of 11 items. The Kidcope has three subscales: Active Coping (Items 3, 6, 8, 10), Negative Coping (Items 4, 5, 7), and Avoidant Coping (Items 1, 2, 9, 11). Each subscale score is obtained by summing the relevant items in order. The possible scores range from 0 to 12 for both the Active Coping and Avoidant Coping subscales, and from 0 to 9 for the Negative Coping subscale. As the score increases, it indicates a higher use of the corresponding coping strategy. |
| The Family Relationship Scale for Children | Data will be collected two times: pre-intervention and immediately post-intervention. | The scale consists of 20 items and was developed to measure how children perceive their relationships with their families. Participants respond to each item with "never" (1), "sometimes" (2), or "always" (3). The scale has two subscales: Restrictive Family Relationships and Supportive Family Relationships. Items 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 14, 16, 18, and 19 form the Restrictive Family Relationships subscale. A higher score in this subscale indicates that the child perceives the relationships within the family as restrictive. Items 1, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 17, and 20 form the Supportive Family Relationships subscale. A higher score in this subscale indicates that the child perceives the relationships within the family as supportive. |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Outcome results
None listed