Skip to content

Research Collaboration for a Precision Oncology Program (POP)

Research Collaboration for a Precision Oncology Program (POP)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06680726
Acronym
POP
Enrollment
200
Registered
2024-11-08
Start date
2023-12-11
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2024-11-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer

Keywords

cancer, real world data (RWD), clinical decision-making, precision oncology, advanced diagnostics, tumor tissue imaging

Brief summary

The Precision Oncology Program (POP) research collaboration aims to help generate information about the individual tumour biology for patients with advanced malignancies, using innovative biotechnologies and patient profile comparison (matching) against specific databases (Real-world data, RWD) and to inform about potential benefit, or lack of benefit, from a given treatment.

Detailed description

This is an observational clinical project. The aim of this research collaboration is to establish processes to advance precision oncology within the clinical routine. POP generates information about individual tumour for patients with advanced cancers using innovative molecular technologies and patient profile comparison (matching) against specific public and non-public databases with the aim to support clinical decision-making (therapy prediction). The POP report will summarize the clinically-relevant findings from the following tests and procedures: A. Routine genetic testing: FMI (routine genetic testing) Comprehensive tumour genotyping which includes alterations in cancer-relevant genes and the following parameters: Tumor mutational burden (TMB), Loss of heterozygosity (LoH), Microsatellite Instability (MSI). B. POP-specific additional testing: 1. Research grade: Imaging Mass Cytometry (IMC) To better capture tumour heterogeneity beyond genetics, and to inform therapy decisions of whether or not a particular treatment may show efficacy, we will perform IMC on existing formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections. IMC technology enables quantification of over 40 selected proteins and protein modifications, while simultaneously interrogating phenotype and cell signaling. It allows identification of markers predictive of response (or resistance) of individual cancer patients, and enables the analysis of tumour tissues at single-cell resolution, capturing characteristics of the tumour cells, the tumour microenvironments and the relationship between tumour, stromal and immune compartments. The analysis of the tumour at the protein level and the spatial distribution of the different compartments will significantly increase and broaden the routine genetic analysis to identify potentially druggable alterations. 2. Patient Matching Against Cancer Databases The patient matching will be performed by Roche using the Flatiron Health-Foundation Medicine Clinico-genomic Database (FH-FMI CGDB). The following scenarios will be explored as part of the project: (i) a comparison of clinical data (e.g. entity, TNM classification, previous therapies, etc) to extract similar clinical phenotypes and the related treatment history and outcomes (clinical level) (ii) a comparison at the genotype level (genomic level) (iii) a combination of the possibilities above. The POP report will be shared with the Molecular Tumour Board (MTB) and discussed in the absence of the treating physician. The MTB will consider all available information at its own discretion and in adherence to the available standard guidelines. However, only treatment recommendations based on routine diagnostics will be forwarded to the treating physician. Hypothetical MTB's treatment decisions based on the POP summary report will not be forwarded the treating physician. NOTE: All additional project specific recommendations remain non-prescriptive and will not be forwarded to the treating physician.

Interventions

OTHERMatching with RWD

A set of clinical and genetic data are matched to generate a RWD cohort for comparison.

OTHERImaging Mass Cytometry

Protein expression patterns in tumor tissue and tumor microenvironment are analyzed by Imaging Mass Cytometry.

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Zurich
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital, Zürich
CollaboratorOTHER
Andreas Wicki
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Signed informed consent * In the case of deceased persons: signed general consent * All patients with the diagnosis of a solid tumour including adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, neuroendocrine carcinoma, sarcoma, etc * ECOG-performance status 0-2, if applicable * Willing and able to understand all project related procedures, including transfer of coded (i.e. pseudonymised) or anonymized clinical data to external partners (e.g. Roche), if applicable

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with the diagnosis of blood cancer.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Utility of RWD matching report as assessed by the questionnaireFrom date of enrollment, assessed up to 2 years1. Is the Report used to identify imminent or future treatment options? 2. How has the Report changed your confidence in the primary decision? 3. Does the Report support the primary therapy decision? 4. Is the relevant information in the Report non supportive of the Resources used or the primary therapy decision? 5. What Resources did you use for the primary therapy decision? 6. How useful was the Report to decide on the secondary therapy decision? 7. Which features of the Report were used for the secondary therapy decision? 8. Could you have gathered the information in the Report used for the secondary treatment decision in less than 15 min? 9. Did the Report provide unique information on personalizing future treatment regimens?
Utility of the IMC report as assessed by the questionnaireFrom date of enrollment, assessed up to 2 years1. Is the Report used to identify imminent or future treatment options? 2. How has the Report changed your confidence in the primary decision? 3. Does the Report support the primary therapy decision? 4. Is the relevant information in the Report non supportive of the Resources used or the primary therapy decision? 5. What Resources did you use for the primary therapy decision? 6. How useful was the Report to decide on the secondary therapy decision? 7. Which features of the Report were used for the secondary therapy decision? 8. Could you have gathered the information in the Report used for the secondary treatment decision in less than 15 min? 9. Did the Report provide unique information on personalizing future treatment regimens?

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of POP reports providedthrough study completion, an average of 1 yearNumber (proportion) of patients in which the POP reports could be provided to the MTB
Classification of Treatment Optionsthrough study completion, an average of 1 yearType of treatment recommendations made by the MTB

Countries

Switzerland

Contacts

Primary ContactAndreas Wicki, Professor
andreas.wicki@usz.ch+41 44 255 38 99
Backup ContactLaura Boos, Dr.
laura.boos@usz.ch+41 43 253 22 20

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026