Postoperative Complications, Sore Throat
Conditions
Keywords
Air-Q SP Laryngeal İntubating Airway, Oropharyngeal leak pressure, proseal larygeal mask, supraglottic airways
Brief summary
Aged- related changes in upper airway anatomy may affect the overall performance of supraglottic airways significantly. In this study, investigator aim to compare the clinical performance, efficacy, and associated complications of the Proseal Laryngeal Mask and the Air-Q Intubation Laryngeal Airway in elderly patients.
Detailed description
Elderly patients are vulnerable to perioperative pulmonary complications during intubation and extubation. Supraglottic airway devices (SADs) have been utilized as a relatively easy method of airway management for resuscitation and difficult intubations and are used during elective general anesthesia with reduced airway complications compared to endotracheal intubation. SADs may help maintain hemodynamic stability as they require less anesthetic agents compared to endotracheal intubation. With aging, parapharyngeal fat accumulation increases, leading to pharyngeal collapse in elderly patients. Additionally, structural changes in the respiratory tract combined with physiological alterations in respiration may reduce oxygen saturation, blunt the hypoxic response, and increase postoperative respiratory complications. Acquired changes in pharyngeal muscle activity with age are thought to increase the likelihood of bony structural changes, such as retrognathia, which is typically considered a difficult airway. Therefore, these age-related changes may impact the clinical performance of SADs. ProSeal LMA is one of the most commonly used supraglottic airway devices in clinical practice. It was developed by modifying the classic LMA in the 2000s and features an inflatable cuff. Additionally, it has a gastric channel for gastric aspiration adjacent to the airway tube. Recently, SGAs (supraglottic airways) that do not require manual cuff inflation have been increasingly used in various clinical situations due to the advantages of eliminating manual cuff inflation and monitoring cuff pressure. Air-Q connects to an airway tube via a communication port that allows self-regulation of cuff pressure in response to airway pressure. In this study, investigator aim to compare the clinical performance, efficacy, and associated complications of the Proseal Laryngeal Mask and the Air-Q Intubation Laryngeal Airway in elderly patients.
Interventions
OTHERAir-Q Intubating Airway
Patients will be inserted Air-Q Intubating Airway under general anesthesia
Patients will be inserted proseal laryngeal mask under general anesthesia.
Sponsors
Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Education and Research Hospital
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* 65-90 year-old patients * American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical Status classification I-III, * Undergoing an elective operation under general anesthesia in our hospital
Exclusion criteria
* Predicted difficult airway (Mallampati class 4, mouth opening \< 3 cm, or thyromental distance \< 6 cm) * body mass index (BMI) \> 40 kg/m2 * Patients with a high risk of aspiration (e.g., history of gastrectomy, -gastroesophageal reflux disease, or hiatal hernia), * Unstable vital signs * Cervical spine problems, Respiratory complications (e.g. recent pneumonia).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Measurement of oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) | One minute after successful LMA placement | One minute after successful LMA placement and fixation, oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) will be measured by setting the adjustable pressure limiting valve (APL) to 40 mmHg and maintaining a fresh gas flow of 3 L/min. The OLP will be recorded as the pressure at which an audible leak sound is heard from the mouth. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| SP Air-Q and proseal LMA insertion time | 3 minutes after induction of anesthesia | Successful LMA placement will be confirmed by visualizing a square waveform on the ventilator and observing chest wall movement. |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Outcome results
None listed