Skip to content

Investigating the Diagnostic Performance of High-resolution Specimen PET-CT in Determining Margin Status in Cancer Resection

A Single Centre Pilot Study Investigating the Diagnostic Performance of High-resolution Specimen PET-CT in Determining Margin Status in Cancer Resection

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06676943
Acronym
eXcision
Enrollment
57
Registered
2024-11-06
Start date
2024-09-20
Completion date
2025-08-28
Last updated
2026-04-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Head and Neck Cancers, Prostate Cancer Surgery

Keywords

specimen PET-CT, surgical margin status

Brief summary

Surgical removal is the treatment for many different cancers. Patient outcomes depend on complete cancer removal with no tumour present at the edge of the section removed (specimen). If cancer is left behind, then patients might need additional cancer treatment. Regardless of whether extra treatment is required, knowing that removal was incomplete causes anxiety. The need for a wide removal of the tumour must be balanced against the harm caused by more extensive surgery particularly when important organs and structures are close by. The fact that the cancer is not visible to the surgeon during the operation means that there is an element of guesswork when deciding how much tissue to remove. This study is examining a technique that the investigators hope will provide surgeons with more precise information about how much tissue to remove during cancer operations using a new type of Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography (PET-CT) scanner. Patients with different types of cancer (e.g. prostate, head and neck cancer) will be injected with a small amount of radioactive tracer at the beginning of their cancer operation. This tracer will attach itself to the cancer cells. Once the surgical specimen is removed it will be placed into the specimen PET-CT scanner so that the surgeon can see the cancer within the specimen. The investigators will then compare the results of the scan of the specimen taken during the operation with the results when the whole specimen has been examined under the microscope. Examination under the microscope is considered to be the gold standard for deciding whether the cancer removal operation has been successful. This study aims to tell us how accurate the new specimen PET-CT scanner results are, and so whether or not surgeons can rely on the results to guide them during operations in the future.

Interventions

PROCEDUREXEOS AURA 10 specimen PET-CT scan of tumour specimens

Participants will be injected with a small amount of radioactive tracer at the beginning of their cancer operation. This tracer will attach itself to the cancer cells. Once the surgical specimen is removed it will be placed into the specimen PET-CT scanner so that the surgeon can see the cancer within the specimen and assess the margin.

Sponsors

University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

For prostate cancer patients: 1. At least 18 years old at time of consent. 2. Listed for Robotic Radical Prostatectomy. For head and neck cancer patients: 1. At least 18 years old at time of consent. 2. Listed for resection of oral squamous cell carcinoma head and neck cancer resection. 3. Specimen able to fit into Xeos Aura specimen container.

Exclusion criteria

For prostate cancer patients: 1. General or local contra-indications for resectional surgery. 2. Lacks capacity to provide informed consent. 3. Currently participating in another interventional research study that in the judgment of the investigator would negatively affect the participant and/or this study's data integrity. For head and neck cancer patients: 1. General or local contra-indications for resectional surgery. 2. Lacks capacity to provide informed consent. 3. Pregnant or breast feeding patient. 4. Currently participating in another interventional research study that in the judgment of the investigator would negatively affect the participant and/or this study's data integrity.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To assess the accuracy of intra-operative high-resolution surgical specimen PET-CT (XEOS Aura 10) in determining margin status during prostate cancer resection, and head and neck cancer resection specimens compared to the reference gold standard.Up to 8 weeks after the day of surgery when the histopathological margin status result is recorded.The true gold standard is whether the cancer is on the margin (positive) or not (negative) as per specimen PET-CT compared to the gold standard radical prostatectomy histopathological margin status, and head and neck cancer resection specimen.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 14, 2026