Ankle Sprains
Conditions
Keywords
Bowen therapy, Cryotherapy
Brief summary
Foot pain is particularly prevalent among older adults, affecting approximately 20% to 37% of men and women aged 45 years and older living in the community. Ankle pain is somewhat less common. This study evaluates the combined impact of cryotherapy (ice application) with Bowen therapy versus traditional medical massage in alleviating symptoms. A total of 41 patients, aged 32-75 years participated and were divided into two treatment groups: one receiving medical massage and ice, and the other Bowen therapy and ice, with three sessions over 15 days. Pain and functionality were measured using the VAS pain scale and Roland-Morris questionnaire. Findings revealed improvements in both groups, with the Bowen therapy group achieving greater pain reduction and functional improvement, suggesting potential advantages of Bowen therapy combined with cryotherapy for managing symptoms.
Interventions
COMBINATION_PRODUCTMedical Massage
This intervention refers to the application of therapeutic massage techniques aimed at alleviating pain and enhancing muscle relaxation in patients with nonspecific low back pain. The treatment focuses on manipulating soft tissues, including muscles, tendons, and fascia, to improve circulation, reduce muscle tension, and promote overall wellness. Medical massage is tailored to each patient's specific needs and can incorporate various techniques, including Swedish massage, Bowen Therapy, a gentle and non-invasive manual therapy, utilizes precise movements on specific points of the body to promote healing and restore balance. The therapist applies light pressure with the fingers, allowing the body to respond and relax. This technique aims to stimulate the body's innate healing mechanisms, encouraging improvements in pain levels and functional capacity. Sessions are typically structured to allow for periods of rest, giving the body time to process the treatment and enhancing its effects.
Sponsors
Rehabilitation Centre Zivot
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Participants aged 32 to 75 years. * Diagnosed with ankle sprain by a qualified healthcare professional (physiatrist or orthopedist). * Able to provide informed consent. * Willing to comply with the study protocol and attend all scheduled therapy sessions.
Exclusion criteria
* Presence of serious spinal pathologies (e.g., cancer, osteoporosis, trauma, or fracture). * History of significant neurological disorders or conditions affecting mobility. * Pregnancy or breastfeeding. * Previous surgical interventions on the spine or significant other surgeries within the last six months. * Current use of medications that affect pain perception (e.g., opioids). * Participation in other therapeutic interventions for low back pain during the study period.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Pain Intensity Reduction | 15 days | Pain intensity will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), which allows participants to rate their pain on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). This measure will be taken at baseline (Day 1) and at the end of the intervention period (Day 15) to evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions in reducing pain levels. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Functional Improvement | 15 days | Functional status will be evaluated using the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, which assesses the impact of ankle sprain on daily activities. Participants will complete this questionnaire at the start of the study and upon completion of the intervention to determine changes in functional ability and quality of life. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Satisfaction | 15 days | Participants will provide feedback regarding their satisfaction with the treatment received through a brief questionnaire administered at the end of the study. This will include questions related to their overall experience with the therapy, perceived effectiveness, and likelihood of recommending the treatment to others. |
Countries
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Outcome results
None listed