Skip to content

Integrating Design Thinking Into Undergraduate Nursing Education

Integrating Design Thinking Into Undergraduate Nursing Education: a Pilot RCT

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06673316
Enrollment
29
Registered
2024-11-04
Start date
2024-07-01
Completion date
2026-01-01
Last updated
2026-04-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nurse Training

Keywords

Design thinking, Nursing education, Problem-solving skills, Empathy, Creativity, Patient-centered care attitude, Collaboration

Brief summary

Previous studies have demonstrated that design thinking workshops can indeed produce these effects in healthcare education settings. However, its effectiveness in nursing curriculum is inconclusive. This research project aims to introduce and integrate design thinking principles into the undergraduate nursing program at the Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK), the Nethersole School of Nursing. By implementing a comprehensive study encompassing desktop research, a 3-hour introductory workshop, and pre- and post-evaluations over a 9-month period, the investigators seek to enhance nursing students' problem-solving skills, empathy, creativity, collaboration, and patient-centered care attitude.

Detailed description

Subjects A group of 50 second-year undergraduate nursing students at CUHK Nethersole School of Nursing who volunteer to participate in the research. Participants will be randomly assigned to either: i) Intervention group (n=25): Receives the design thinking workshop; ii) Control group (n=25): Receives no intervention (continues with regular curriculum). According to Hertzog (2008), a minimum of 25 subjects per group would be considered sufficient for the purposes of pilot testing. Students who have prior experience in joining design thinking workshop will be excluded. Methodology This study employs a pilot randomized controlled design to evaluate the impact of a design thinking workshop on undergraduate nursing students' problem-solving abilities and related skills. The methodology encompasses a comprehensive literature review, pre- and post-workshop assessments, and a 3-hour introductory workshop on design thinking principles applied to healthcare challenges. 1. Systematic review and preparation of material A systematic review will be conducted to examine existing applications of design thinking in healthcare education, particularly in nursing, informing workshop curriculum development in terms of content, delivery method and evaluation approach. 2. Pre-Workshop Evaluation An online survey one month before the workshop will be conducted to assess participants' baseline skills and attitudes using validated instruments. These instruments measure problem-solving abilities, empathy, creativity, collaboration, and patient-centered care attitudes. 3. Design Thinking Workshop A 3-hour introductory workshop will cover the five stages of design thinking: Empathize, Define, Ideate, Prototype, and Test. Students will work on scenario of real-world healthcare challenges, and apply design thinking principles to develop innovative solutions. 4. Post-Workshop Evaluation Immediately after the workshop, participants will complete a post-workshop survey using the same instruments as the pre-workshop evaluation, allowing for comparison of scores.

Interventions

OTHERDesign thinking workshop

The workshop will cover the five stages of design thinking, allowing students to apply these principles to real-world healthcare challenges in their future practice.

Sponsors

Chinese University of Hong Kong
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

\- Undergraduate nursing students at CUHK Nethersole School of Nursing who volunteer to participate in the research.

Exclusion criteria

* Nil

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Problem-solving AbilitiesBaselinerating on the Eight subscales of capabilities in Student engagement questionnaire (SEQ) (1=Strongly disagree, 5= Strongly Agree)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
CreativityBaselinerating on the Eight subscales of capabilities in Student engagement questionnaire (SEQ) (1=Strongly disagree, 5= Strongly Agree)
CollaborationBaselinerating on the Eight subscales of capabilities in Student engagement questionnaire (SEQ) (1=Strongly disagree, 5= Strongly Agree)
EmpathyBaselinerating on the Jefferson Scale of Empathy - Health Professions Student Version (JSE-HPS) (1=Strongly disagree, 5= Strongly Agree)
Patient-centered Care attitudeBaselinerating on the Patient-Practitioner Orientation Scale (PPOS), 1= strongly disagree, 5=strongly agree

Countries

Hong Kong

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORCarmen WH Chan

The Nethersole School of Nursing

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 14, 2026