Dental Occlusion, Occlusal Analysis
Conditions
Keywords
Occlusal analysis, Occlusense, Intraoral scanners
Brief summary
The aims of this observational study are to evaluate the trueness of two different digital occlusal analyzers; handheld occlusal analyzer versus intraoral scanner in comparison to conventional methods in identifying true occlusal contacts and to evaluate inter-examiner reliability of two examiners independently analyzing occlusal contacts.
Detailed description
Evaluate the trueness of two different digital occlusal analyzers; handheld occlusal analyzer (occlusense) versus intraoral scanner (Medit i700-medit occlusal analyzer) in comparison to conventional methods (8 um articulating paper) in identifying true occlusal contacts and to evaluate inter-examiner reliability of two examiners independently analyzing occlusal contacts.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Normal occlusion (Angle Class 1) * No missing teeth * No tempromandibular disorders
Exclusion criteria
Patients having: * Dental prostheses * Extensive restorations * Severe malocclusion * Periodontal disease * Excessive tooth wear * Orofacial pain * Temporomandibular joint disorders * Anterior or posterior open bite * Active orthodontic treatment.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of trueness | 4 months | Trueness is defined as the closeness of the measurement to the real size of an object. The trueness of handheld occlusal analyzers (occlusense) versus intraoral scanners (medit occlusal analyzer) will be evaluated in comparison to conventional methods (8 um articulating paper). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Inter-examiner reliability | 4 months | Two examiners will record independently the interocclusal contacts for all the different groups, classifying them in a dichotomy variable (yes/no) contact or not per tooth. Then, the inter-examiner's reliability will be calculated. |
Countries
Egypt