Skip to content

Indocyanine Green Fluoroscopy and SPY Angiography for the Assessment of Lymphatic Structure in Breast Cancer Patients at Risk for Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema

Prospective Analysis of Patients at Risk for Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema (BCRL) Using Indocyanine Green (ICG) Fluoroscopy and SPYTM Angiography

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06672224
Enrollment
0
Registered
2024-11-04
Start date
2025-08-14
Completion date
2026-08-14
Last updated
2025-09-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema, Breast Carcinoma

Brief summary

This clinical trial assesses the change in lymphatic structure from placement of an intravenous (IV) line and fluid administration using a diagnostic agent, indocyanine green (ICG), with SPY (Trademark) angiography in breast cancer patients at risk for breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). Patients that are diagnosed with breast cancer with lymph node involvement often undergo treatment that includes surgery to remove the axillary nodes and radiation. Unfortunately, this procedure increases the incidence of BCRL in the surgical arm, as well as other problems including heaviness of the arm, fibrotic skin changes, and an increase in infection risk. Because of these symptoms, venipuncture (blood draw) is often avoided in these arms. Researchers want to show that placement of an IV line and fluid administration in patients at risk for BCRL will indeed not alter the lymphatic structure of the arm and will not change the incidence of BCRL by administering indocyanine green (ICG) dye to patients and assessing their arm lymphatics. ICG is a fluorescent dye that is able to be visualized by the SPY angiography imaging system as it travels through the lymphatic system, allowing researchers to assess how well blood flows throughout the body. Receiving ICG and undergoing SPY angiography may be effective in showing that placement of an IV and fluid administration in breast cancer patients at risk for BCRL will not alter the lymphatic structure of their arm and will not change the incidence of BCRL.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. Assess the change in lymphatic architecture resulting from placement of an IV line and fluid administration in patients at risk for BCRL. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. Identify changes in presence/severity of lymphedema based on: Ia. SOZO Digital Health Platform scale; Ib. Patient self-reported outcomes; Ic. Arm circumference. II. Assess association between SOZO scale, MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) lymphedema score (LS), and patient-reported outcomes. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. Observe changes in mapping of superficial lymphatics that are responsible for the upper extremity arm with use of ICG dye and SPY angiography. II. Identify risk factors associated with higher rates of lymphedema after IV line/fluid administration. OUTLINE: Patients receive ICG dye subcutaneously (SC) and receive fluids IV over one hour and undergo SPY imaging and lymphedema assessment on day 1. Patients also receive ICG dye and undergo imaging and lymphedema assessments again at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months on study.

Interventions

PROCEDUREFluid Therapy

Given IV

DRUGIndocyanine Green

Given subcutaneously

OTHERQuestionnaire Administration

Ancillary studies

Undergo lymphedema assessment

PROCEDURESPY Elite Fluorescence Imaging

Undergo SPY imaging

OTHERSurvey Administration

Ancillary studies

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
City of Hope Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Documented written informed consent of the participant * Men or women age: \>= 18 years * Diagnosis of breast cancer * Full axillary dissection at least 12 months prior * Patient needs vena puncture and has problem with access in the contralateral arm. Recruitment includes patients who do not wish to use their contralateral arm, lower extremities, or central access through their neck, as well as patients for whom multiple attempts result in increased anxiety, discomfort, and treatment delays * No clinical evidence of lymphedema by MD Anderson grading system and normal SOZO values compared to contralateral arm * Willingness to: * Complete Lymphedema Life Impact Scale (LLIS) survey * Allow measurement of arm circumference, bioimpedance, and ICG imaging in real time * Permit medical record/clinical laboratory result review

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with active malignancy (i.e., currently undergoing treatment), infection, or bleeding tendency * Diagnosis of lymphedema * Women of childbearing potential: pregnant/nursing

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of patients with worsening lymphedema in the affected armBaseline to 12 monthsMeasured by the MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) lymphedema score (LS) (measured on a scale of 0 to 5) increased by at least 1 level. Will be estimated as a percentage of patients with MDACC lymphedema score that is at least 1 unit worse at 12 months than at baseline; 95% confidence interval (CI) will be calculated.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in lymphedema severity based on SOZO Digital Health Platform scaleBaseline to 12 monthsWill be calculated (with appropriate confidence intervals); Pearson (or Spearman, as appropriate) correlation coefficients will be calculated to assess the strength of relationship between all four assessment methods (all time points). Graphical representation of data will be used to help understand and assess the nature of the relationship of these modalities.
Change in patient self-reported outcomes scoresBaseline to 12 monthsWill be calculated (with appropriate confidence intervals); Pearson (or Spearman, as appropriate) correlation coefficients will be calculated to assess the strength of relationship between all four assessment methods (all time points). Graphical representation of data will be used to help understand and assess the nature of the relationship of these modalities.
Change in arm circumference measurementsBaseline to 12 monthsWill be calculated (with appropriate confidence intervals); Pearson (or Spearman, as appropriate) correlation coefficients will be calculated to assess the strength of relationship between all four assessment methods (all time points). Graphical representation of data will be used to help understand and assess the nature of the relationship of these modalities.
Correlation between lymphedema assessment methods (1) MDACC LS, (2) patient-reported outcomes, (3) SOZO scale, and (4) arm circumferenceBaseline to 12 monthsWill be calculated (with appropriate confidence intervals); Pearson (or Spearman, as appropriate) correlation coefficients will be calculated to assess the strength of relationship between all four assessment methods (all time points). Graphical representation of data will be used to help understand and assess the nature of the relationship of these modalities.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026