Skip to content

Primary Percutaneous Stenting Above the Ampulla Versus Endoscopic Drainage for Unresectable Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction

Primary Percutaneous Stenting Above the Ampulla Versus Endoscopic Drainage for Unresectable Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction (TESLA RCT)

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06671418
Acronym
TESLA RCT
Enrollment
148
Registered
2024-11-04
Start date
2023-08-09
Completion date
2027-11-01
Last updated
2024-11-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cholangiocarcinoma Non-resectable, Gall Bladder Cancer, Liver Metastasis, Malignant Hilar Stricture

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical randomized controlled trial is to perform primary percutaneous stenting (PPS) in patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO). The main question it aims to answer is: To compare the efficacy of PPS above the ampulla to standard endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) in patients with a MHBO who are ineligible for surgical resection. Researchers will compare PPS with EBD to see if major complications within 90 days after randomisation occur. Participants will undergo either primary percutaneous stenting or endoscopic biliary drainage, depending on randomization.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPrimary percutaneous stenting (PPS)

PPS bridging malignant hilar biliary obstruction with self-expandable uncovered metal stents without crossing the ampulla and without leaving an external drain. The procedure is performed by an interventional radiologist who has performed at least 5 PPS procedures.

EBD according to the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) guidelines of 2021. The procedure is performed by a gastro-enterologist who is experienced in performing EBD in patients with a MHBO.

Sponsors

Dutch Cancer Society
CollaboratorOTHER
Erasmus Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Written informed consent must be given according to ICH/GCP and national/local regulations. * MHBO on imaging with histopathological confirmation or high clinical suspicion. * Ineligible for surgical resection. * Hyperbilirubinemia (a combination of a total bilirubin level \>50 mmol/l.

Exclusion criteria

* Fluctuation or spontaneous decrease of a total bilirubin level before start of any treatment suggesting a potential non-malignant diagnosis. * Patients who underwent previous biliary drainage procedures endoscopically or percutaneously. Patients who underwent an attempted but failed ERCP are eligible only when no papillotomy or cannulation was performed. * Clinical signs of cholangitis. Cholangitis is defined as the presence of both fever (i.e. body temperature \>38.5°C) and leucocytosis (i.e. ≥10 \*109/L) without clinical or radiological evidence of acute cholecystitis (22). * Uncorrectable coagulation disorder. * Uncorrectable contrast allergy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Major complications within 90 days after randomisation90 days after randomizationThe primary objective is to compare major complications within 90 days after randomization of PPS and EBD in patients with MHBO who are ineligible for surgical resection. Major complications are defined as any complication leading to prolonged hospital stay of more than 72 hours, readmission to hospital, invasive reintervention, or death.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026