Skip to content

A Trial Comparing High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Noninvasive Ventilation on Reintubation and Post-Extubation Respiratory Failure in High-Risk Patients With Systolic Heart Failure

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Noninvasive Ventilation on Reintubation and Post-Extubation Respiratory Failure in High-Risk Patients With Systolic Heart Failure

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06671015
Acronym
EXTUBATE-HF
Enrollment
50
Registered
2024-11-04
Start date
2025-10-04
Completion date
2027-02-01
Last updated
2026-05-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Respiratory Failure, Systolic Heart Failure

Brief summary

This prospective, open-label randomized controlled pilot trial will enroll participants at the Yale New Haven Hospital. Patients with systolic heart failure, defined as an ejection fraction ≤40%, who require invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and are admitted to either the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) or medical ICU (MICU) will be included. Subjects meeting eligibility criteria will be randomized 1:1 to one of the two treatment groups: * Intervention: Extubation to high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) * Control: Extubation to non-invasive ventilation (NIV)

Detailed description

The primary objective is to compare the rates of reintubation and post-extubation respiratory failure for high-risk patients with systolic heart failure extubated to HFNC or NIV. Reintubation will be at the discretion of the attending physician. In doing so, this pilot study will provide the framework for an appropriately powered randomized controlled trial.

Interventions

DEVICEAirvo 3

Provides effective therapy for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and post-extubation respiratory support for 24 hours post-extubation.

Sponsors

Yale University
Lead SponsorOTHER
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Limited
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Patients with systolic heart failure admitted to the CICU or MICU at Yale New Haven Hospital who require IMV for \>24 hours.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The patient is a male or non-pregnant female greater than or equal to 18 years of age * The patient is ventilated for greater than 24 hours * The patient has a systolic left ventricular dysfunction defined as an ejection fraction less than or equal to 40% * The patient, or legally authorized representative, has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions, and has provided written informed consent, approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board (IRB) or Ethics Committee (EC).

Exclusion criteria

* Patients actively being treated for a COPD exacerbation or known hypercapnia (PaCO2\>45) on last Arterial Blood Gas (ABG) * Patients agitated or uncooperative state * Patients with do-not-resuscitate orders * Patients presenting with tracheostomies or anatomical abnormalities interfering with mask fit * Patients are prisoners * Patient self-extubates * Patients with pre-existing NIV prescription (e.g., obstructive sleep apnea, neuromuscular disorders, advanced COPD)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of participants with reintubation or respiratory failure within 72 hours post-extubationup to 72 hours post-extubationNumber of participants with reintubation or respiratory failure within 72 hours post-extubation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Reintubation or respiratory failure48 hours, 7 days, and up to ICU discharge (an average of 30 days post-extubation)Number of participants that experience reintubation or respiratory failure (per specific, predetermined criteria) within 48 hours, 7 days, and up to ICU discharge (an average of 30 days)
Patient intolerance to assigned treatmentup to 24 hours post-extubationIntolerance will be measured as the ability to continue the therapy for the 24 hour treatment period (yes/no).
Mean length of stayup to 30 days post-extubationMean length of ICU and hospital stay in days
Incidence of ICU mortalityup to ICU discharge (an average of 30 days post-extubation)Number of participants with mortality while in ICU
Hospital mortality48 hours, 72 hours, 7 days, and hospital discharge (an average of 30 days post-extubation)Number of participants with mortality while in hospital
Time to reintubationImmediately post-extubation up to 30 days post-extubationMean number of hours to reintubation after extubation
Respiratory rate-oxygenation (ROX) index and vectoron day of extubationThe ROX index, defined as the ratio of oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2)/ fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) to respiratory rate (RR), is used as a predictor of the need to intubate in patients that received HFNC oxygen therapy. Low ROX index (\< 3): Indicates a higher risk of HFNC failure. High ROX index (\> 4.88): Suggests a lower risk of HFNC failure.

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTElliott Miller, MD, MS
elliott.miller@yale.edu203-737-6390
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORElliott Miller, MD, MS

Yale University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 29, 2026