Skip to content

Suturing Techniques for Vesico-urethral Anastomosis

A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effects of Suturing Techniques for Vesico-urethral Anastomosis on One-year Voiding Function After Radical Prostatectomy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06670924
Enrollment
70
Registered
2024-11-01
Start date
2022-02-07
Completion date
2024-08-16
Last updated
2024-11-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer Surgery

Keywords

prostate cancer, vesicourethral anastomosis, voiding function, suture

Brief summary

Radical prostatectomy (RP) is the most common curative treatment for prostate cancer (PCa).Vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA) is a crucial step and either a conventional interrupted (IS) or a running (RS) suture is employed during radical prostatectomy (RP). Certainly, both RS and IS have advantages and limitations. The metanalysis revealed that potential advantages for RS compared to IS, especially for short-term outcomes such as catheterization time, extravasation rate, and anastomotic suture time. There were no significant differences for long-term outcomes (continence, incidence of vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis). Generally, the exciting evidence suggests that CS should be preferred over IS. However, this should be followed only if it is technically feasible and appropriate regarding the surgical approach. Both techniques seem to be safe and appropriate for the VUA, and the technique should be chosen based on individual experience and preference. The investigators hypothesized that RS and IS may have different effects on voiding function and flow rate, even if they do not cause an anastomotic stenosis requiring intervention. Furthermore, there is no existing literature that compares RS and IS in terms of voiding function.This article focuses on one year uroflowmetric voiding parameters, urinary function (UF), and UF related bother function, urinary continence recovery as well as other secondary outcomes, including surgical parameters, perioperative morbidity and oncological outcomes.

Interventions

PROCEDURERunning suture for vesico-urethral anastomosis in open radical prostatectomy

The surgical technique of the RS followed the description of Van Velthovens, was applied with slight modifications. Two 3/0 absorbable monofilament (polydioxanone) sutures were used. The first needle is started from bladder neck at 3 o'clock, and terminated in the urethra at 9 o'clock. After completion of the posterior anastomosis, a transurethral catheter is placed. The second sutures' needle is passed from the bladder at 9 o'clock and ended in the urethra at 3 o'clock. The bladder neck and urethra are merged by gentle traction of the anterior and posterior sutures at 3 and 9 o'clock.

PROCEDUREinterrupted suture for vesico-urethral anastomosis in open radical prostatectomy

The technique described by Walsh for interrupted anastomotic suturing was applied with minor modifications. Six 3/0 absorbable monofilament (polydioxanone) sutures were placed at 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11 o'clock to accomplish the vesicourethral anastomosis.

Sponsors

Kartal City Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Masking description

Data were collected by an independent database administrator and stored in a password-protected Microsoft Excel file. The data files were not accessible to the surgical team or to residents or ancillary staff involved in postoperative care.

Intervention model description

The investigators conducted a two-group, parallel-design, pragmatic study of 70 consecutive patients with clinically localised (pT1-pT2) PCa undergoing primary open RP by a well-experienced single surgical team at Dr Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital as a tertiary care institution .The optimal sample size for this study was calculated to be 70 patients (35 patients in each arm) by the power calculation (α = 0.05, β = 0.1, power: 90%) The subjects were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups using a simple randomization procedure that involved computer-generated random numbers in Microsoft Excel.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of clinically localised (pT1-pT2) prostate cancer * must select the open radical prostatectomy procedure as a treatment option.

Exclusion criteria

* History of acute urinary retention * History of urethral stricture

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maximum flow rate (MFR)preoperative and 1,3,6,12 months visits after surgery.Uroflowmetry is a noninvasive test that measures the rate of urine flow over time. Uroflowmetry involves a well-hydrated patient voiding into a uroflowmeter, which in turn generates a flow curve. The flow curve enables the measurement of the MFR .A value of 15ml/sec or below is deemed to be outside the normal range.
Post-voiding residuel volume (PVR)preoperative and 1,3,6,12 months visits after surgery.PVR is defined as the residual urine volume in the bladder following voiding, as calculated by ultrasound imaging. A volume of 150 cc or above is regarded as pathological.
Urinary function(UF)preoperative and 1,3,6,12 months visits after surgery.Urinary function(UF) and urinary function-related bother: UF measured by the International Prostate Symptom Score \[IPSS\]) The IPSS is based on the answers to seven questions concerning urinary symptoms. Each question is assigned points from 0 to 5 indicating increasing severity of the particular symptom. The total score can therefore range from 0 to 35 . UF-related bother measured by the IPSS quality of life question with a response from 0 to 6.
Continence recoverypreoperative and 1,3,6,12 months visits after surgery.Urinary continence recovery defined as patient-reported use of zero pad or one security pad per day.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Anastomotic extravasationPostoperative day 5.Presence of anastomotic extravasation on first cystogram
Perioperative complicationsThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearClavien-Dindo scoring system
Surgical parametersDuring the operationDuration of vesico-urethral anastomosis time

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026