Anxiety, Chest Pain, Sleep
Conditions
Brief summary
This study will be used to compare the effects of two auditory stimulation methods on improving vital signs parameters, reducing the severity of chest pain, and improving the sleep quality of cardiac patients.
Detailed description
This study aims to To evaluate the relative efficacy of two auditory stimulation techniques in enhancing cardiac patients' vital sign assessments. * This study aims to examine two auditory stimulations for their ability to alleviate chest pain in patients with heart conditions. * The goal of this study is to evaluate two audio stimulations for their potential to help heart patients have a better night's rest. This research made use of two different therapies including audio stimulation. Group A used familiar auditory stimulus, which was a spoken message, and group B used sounds of nature. Patients with preexisting cardiac conditions who were admitted to a predetermined critical care unit and who subsequently intended to have percutaneous coronary artery intervention (PCI)
Interventions
OTHERFamily voice
Group A receives the family voice
OTHERNature sound
Group B receives the nature sound.
Sponsors
Damanhour University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Intervention model description
Group A will receive a family voice message and Group B will be received nature sound
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* adult (aged≥18 years). * diagnosed with cardiac disease. * patient with hemodynamic stability * consciousness and ability to communicate.
Exclusion criteria
* patients unable to comply with study interventions * patients with cognitive impairment * patients with severe unstable cardiac condition * having a history of hearing loss or the use of a hearing aid.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| sleep quality | three days after intervention | sleep quality used Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ). it consisted of five items score from zero mean poor pattern and 100 mean good |
| severity of chest pain | three days after intervention | Visual analogue scale consisted of score from 0 to 10 zero mean no pain and 10 mean high pain |
| level of anxiety and depression | three days after intervention | The hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) questionnaire consisted of 14 questions 7 for anxiety and 7 for depression score score 0-7 mean normal; score 8-10 mean mild; score 11-15, mean moderate; and score 16-21, mean severely |
Countries
Egypt
Outcome results
None listed