Paraganglioma, Pheochromocytoma
Conditions
Brief summary
This is a retrospective observational cohort study involving patients with suspected PPGLs who underwent 131I-MIBG scanning and surgical treatment between January 2020 and April 2023. The objective is to evaluate the correlation between MIBG imaging score and intraoperative hemodynamic fluctuations.
Detailed description
This is a retrospective observational cohort study involving patients with suspected PPGLs who underwent 131I-MIBG scanning and surgical treatment between January 2020 and April 2023. The objective is to evaluate the correlation between MIBG imaging score and intraoperative hemodynamic fluctuations.
Interventions
Patients received thyroid blockade using solution of potassium iodide before the examination. After intravenous administration of 111 MBq of 131I-MIBG, whole body planar images were acquired at 24 hours (Day 1) and 48 hours (Day 2), respectively.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Patients with suspected PPGLs who received 131I-MIBG scintigraphy and were treated by surgery
Exclusion criteria
* 1\) surgery was performed more than 6 months after 131I-MIBG scintigraphy; 2) tumor located in bladder where radioactive urine would influence assessment of tumor; 3) tumor was not resected as a whole; 4) resected tumor was not PPGLs confirmed by pathology; 5) 131I-MIBG scintigraphy images or intraoperative BP was not available for assessment.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Difference of SBP ARV and MAP ARV in Different Groups | Intraoperative systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were recorded automatically in a 5 min interval from the beginning to the end of surgery. | Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was calculated with the formula: MAP=1/3\*SBP+2/3\*DBP. ARV, which was defined as the average of absolute difference between successive BP values |
Countries
China