Ametropia, Refractive Errors
Conditions
Keywords
refractive errors, refractive errors screening, pediatric refractive measurements, preliminary study, tunable focus phoropter
Brief summary
This study aimed to compare refractive measurements using Vision-S™ 700, an immersive and compact phoropter with a tunable-focus lens, and Vision-R™ 800, a phoropter with a tunable-focus lens without immersion, with cycloplegic refraction serving as the gold-standard. This a retrospective study aimed to enroll 41 children, aged 6 to 16 years, who underwent refractive assessments with Vision-S™ 700, Vision-R™ 800, and cycloplegic refraction. The primary objective involves a comparison of the spherical equivalent between both devices and compared to cycloplegic refraction. Secondary outcomes include the analysis of astigmatism components (J0° and J45°) and subgroup analyses in myopic and hyperopic children.
Interventions
As of today, no published clinical studies have been conducted with the Vision-S™ 700 neither Vision R 800
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* 6 to 16 years old patients followed in the Brest University Hospital Center, in France, between the 1st of November 2022 and the 30th of April 2023 and requiring a cycloplegic refraction not presenting an
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Spherical equivalent | Day 1 | The primary outcome of this study was to compare the spherical equivalent, obtained using two different devices: Vision-S™ 700, an immersive phoropter with a tunable-focus lens, and Vision-R™ 800, a phoropter with a tunable-focus lens without immersion. The study aimed to assess the overall agreement of these measurements with cycloplegic refraction, considered the gold standard in this context. |
Countries
France