Skip to content

Validity and Reliability of the Mastitis Symptom Severity Assessment Methods (M-Score and BISSI) in Non-Lactational Mastitis

Validity and Reliability of the Mastitis Symptom Severity Assessment Methods (M-Score and BISSI) in Non-Lactational Mastitis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06667609
Enrollment
320
Registered
2024-10-31
Start date
2024-08-28
Completion date
2026-05-26
Last updated
2026-04-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Granulomatous Mastitis, Mastitis Chronic

Keywords

M-score, validity, reliability

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Mastitis-score (M-score) and the Breast Inflammatory Symptom Severity Index (BISSI) as measures for assessing symptom severity in non-lactational granulomatous lobular/periductal mastitis (NL-GLM/PDM). This research aims to provide a valid and reliable tool for evaluating both symptom severity and treatment efficacy in NL-GLM/PDM.

Detailed description

Non-lactational granulomatous lobular/periductal mastitis (NL-GLM/PDM) are inflammatory breast diseases with unclear etiology, usually manifested as palpable breast mass, accompanied by breast pain and abscesses, erythema or fistula formation. There is no well-recognized assessment tool for evaluating the symptom severity and treatment efficacy of NL-GLM/PDM. In our previous studies with NL-GLM, we used the Mastitis-score (M-score) as a physician-directed measure of the symptom severity. However, there were no patient-reported outcome measure for NL-GLM/PDM. The Breast Inflammatory Symptom Severity Index(BISSI) was reported as a valid patient-reported outcome measure for lactational mastitis. Its clinical validity as a measure of Symptom Severity for NL-GLM/PDM are still unclear. In this multicenter, prospective cohort study, we will validate the validity and reliability of the M-score, a physician-directed measure, and the Breast Inflammatory Symptom Severity Index (BISSI), a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure, for assessing symptom severity in patients with non-lactational granulomatous lobular/periductal mastitis (NL-GLM/PDM). Establishing the validity of these two approaches will facilitate the objective measurement of treatment efficacy for NL-GLM/PDM in the future.

Interventions

OTHERAny treatments regimen

Participants may receive any treatments in accordance with standard clinical practice, based on physicians' recommendations and patients' preferences.

Sponsors

Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Female, age between 18 and 65 years; 2. Clinically considered as Non-Lactational mastitis; 3. Clinically and Pathologically confirmed NL-GLM/PDM; 4. Patients planning to receive treatment or observation alone; 5. Signed the informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with confirmed or suspected malignant breast tumors 2. Patients with bilateral mastitis (including those with bilateral Non-Lactational Mastitis occurring simultaneously or successively) 3. Pregnant.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Inter-rater Reliability8 weeksThis assesses the consistency of results from different evaluators regarding the various dimensions of the Mscore and the total M-score for the same patients at the same time.
Test-Retest Reliability8 weeksThis assesses the consistency of the M-score/BISSI results for the same patient at different times (within 1 week after enrollment), prior to treatment initiation and when symptoms have not changed significantly.
Clinical Validity8 weeksThis aims to estimate the correlation between the M-score/BISSI and its changes, and the BISSI and its changes, with traditional evaluator assessments or traditional patient self-assessments of treatment efficacy and its changes.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Correlation between the M-score/BISSI with laboratory indicators8 weeksExplore the correlation between the M-score/BISSI with white blood cell counts, neutrophil counts, lymphocyte counts, neutrophil/lympocyte ratio, CRP, ESR, TNF-alpha, and IL-6.
Cutoff value for M-score/BISSI to defined clinical complete remission.8 weeksInvestigate the optimal cutoff value of the M-score/BISSI for defining clinical complete remission.
Correlation between the M-score and BISSI scores.8 weeksExamine the correlation between the M-score and BISSI scores.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 10, 2026