Granulomatous Mastitis, Mastitis Chronic
Conditions
Keywords
M-score, validity, reliability
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Mastitis-score (M-score) and the Breast Inflammatory Symptom Severity Index (BISSI) as measures for assessing symptom severity in non-lactational granulomatous lobular/periductal mastitis (NL-GLM/PDM). This research aims to provide a valid and reliable tool for evaluating both symptom severity and treatment efficacy in NL-GLM/PDM.
Detailed description
Non-lactational granulomatous lobular/periductal mastitis (NL-GLM/PDM) are inflammatory breast diseases with unclear etiology, usually manifested as palpable breast mass, accompanied by breast pain and abscesses, erythema or fistula formation. There is no well-recognized assessment tool for evaluating the symptom severity and treatment efficacy of NL-GLM/PDM. In our previous studies with NL-GLM, we used the Mastitis-score (M-score) as a physician-directed measure of the symptom severity. However, there were no patient-reported outcome measure for NL-GLM/PDM. The Breast Inflammatory Symptom Severity Index(BISSI) was reported as a valid patient-reported outcome measure for lactational mastitis. Its clinical validity as a measure of Symptom Severity for NL-GLM/PDM are still unclear. In this multicenter, prospective cohort study, we will validate the validity and reliability of the M-score, a physician-directed measure, and the Breast Inflammatory Symptom Severity Index (BISSI), a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure, for assessing symptom severity in patients with non-lactational granulomatous lobular/periductal mastitis (NL-GLM/PDM). Establishing the validity of these two approaches will facilitate the objective measurement of treatment efficacy for NL-GLM/PDM in the future.
Interventions
Participants may receive any treatments in accordance with standard clinical practice, based on physicians' recommendations and patients' preferences.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Female, age between 18 and 65 years; 2. Clinically considered as Non-Lactational mastitis; 3. Clinically and Pathologically confirmed NL-GLM/PDM; 4. Patients planning to receive treatment or observation alone; 5. Signed the informed consent form
Exclusion criteria
1. Patients with confirmed or suspected malignant breast tumors 2. Patients with bilateral mastitis (including those with bilateral Non-Lactational Mastitis occurring simultaneously or successively) 3. Pregnant.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Inter-rater Reliability | 8 weeks | This assesses the consistency of results from different evaluators regarding the various dimensions of the Mscore and the total M-score for the same patients at the same time. |
| Test-Retest Reliability | 8 weeks | This assesses the consistency of the M-score/BISSI results for the same patient at different times (within 1 week after enrollment), prior to treatment initiation and when symptoms have not changed significantly. |
| Clinical Validity | 8 weeks | This aims to estimate the correlation between the M-score/BISSI and its changes, and the BISSI and its changes, with traditional evaluator assessments or traditional patient self-assessments of treatment efficacy and its changes. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Correlation between the M-score/BISSI with laboratory indicators | 8 weeks | Explore the correlation between the M-score/BISSI with white blood cell counts, neutrophil counts, lymphocyte counts, neutrophil/lympocyte ratio, CRP, ESR, TNF-alpha, and IL-6. |
| Cutoff value for M-score/BISSI to defined clinical complete remission. | 8 weeks | Investigate the optimal cutoff value of the M-score/BISSI for defining clinical complete remission. |
| Correlation between the M-score and BISSI scores. | 8 weeks | Examine the correlation between the M-score and BISSI scores. |
Countries
China