Skip to content

Validation of ICG-99mTc-nanoscan as Hybrid Tracer for Sentinel Node Biopsy

Validation of ICG-99mTc-nanoscan as Hybrid Tracer for Sentinel Node Biopsy

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06666634
Acronym
NANOSCAN
Enrollment
29
Registered
2024-10-30
Start date
2023-04-01
Completion date
2025-07-14
Last updated
2026-07-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Melanoma, Oral Cancer, Penile Cancer

Keywords

Fluorescence, Radioactivity, Indocyanine green, Clinical node negative patients, Surgical staging

Brief summary

99mTc-nanocolloid, the world wide used hybrid tracer for dynamic sentinel node biopsy, has recently been replaced with 99mTc-nanoscan. The hybrid form (ICG-99mTc-nanoscan) has not yet been validated, to show the similarity between the lymphatic drainage pattern between ICG-99mTc-nanoscan and 99mTc-nanoscan.

Detailed description

The investigators want to set up this study in analogy with the comparison study which was conducted before the introduction of ICG-99mTc-Nanocolloid (99mTc-Nanocoll vs. ICG-99mTc-Nanocoll (NL26699.031.09 -N09DRF). In particular, the investigators want to validate that the hybrid ICG-99m Tc-Nanoscan shows the same preoperative gland involvement on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and that the intraoperative signal intensities remain the same. All this to maintain the level of current care.

Interventions

DRUGSentinel node biopsy with either ICG-99mTc-nanoscan or 99mTc-nanoscan

Sentinel node biopsy with either ICG-99mTc-nanoscan or 99mTc-nanoscan

Sponsors

The Netherlands Cancer Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient who will undergo a sentinel node procedure in routine care. * Patients \> 18 years; * Patients presenting with: * a primary cutaneous melanoma of head/neck or upper part of the trunk or extremities; * OR patients presenting with a primary oral cavity malignancy T1-2N0 * OR patients with primary penile cancer * Patients with clinical N0 stage; * Patients scheduled for a sentinel node biopsy prior to (re-)excision of the primary lesion; * Patients in which ICG-99mTc-nanoscan would be used in routine care or a research setting

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with known allergy to patent blue dye or nanocolloid; * Patients who are pregnant or breast-feeding mothers; * History of hypersensitivity reactions to products containing human serum albumin; * History of iodine allergy * Hyperthyroid or thyroidal adenoma * Kidney insufficiency * Incapacity or unwillingness of participant to give written informed consent;

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Concordance between tracersMeasured at pre-operative imagingTo demonstrate concordance between the SN visualization of 99mTc-nanoscan and ICG-99mTc-nanoscan on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and SPECT/CT imaging, expecting an average of 3 sentinel nodes per patient. Discordance is defined as more than 1 sentinel node not detected coherently by the tracers.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Higher echelon nodesMeasured at pre-operative imagingNumber of higher-echelon nodes visualized on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and SPECT/CT imaging for both tracers (ICG-99mTc-Nanoscan and 99mTc-Nanoscan);
Concordance between intraoperative fluorescence and radioactive findingsMeasured at pre-operative imagingNumber of the fluorescent nodes at time of excision; \- Number and radioactive signal intensity of the radioactive nodes at time of excision;

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 23, 2026