Skip to content

Examination of Nociscan Impact on Low Back Pain Surgical Outcomes

A Multi-Center Randomized Clinical Study of the NOCISCAN MR Spectroscopy (MRS) in Patients Treated for Discogenic Low Back Pain

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06661850
Acronym
CLARITY
Enrollment
300
Registered
2024-10-28
Start date
2025-06-11
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2026-09-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Keywords

MR Spectroscopy, MRI, back pain, Nociscan

Brief summary

This study is looking into how useful NOCISCAN is. NOCISCAN is a software as a Service (SaaS) tool that uses Magnetic Resonance (MR) spectroscopy. Nociscan leverages MRS to noninvasively help physicians distinguish between painful and nonpainful discs in the lumbar spine. The randomized controlled trial will compare the blinded and unblinded cohorts and their corresponding surgical outcomes with the Nocigram reports, generated prior to treatment, for each patient.

Interventions

PROCEDUREFusion or TDR determined by investigator.

The surgical treatment will be decided by the treating investigator based on their clinical judgement.

Sponsors

Aclarion
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY
MCRA
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subject is a skeletally mature male or female (non-pregnant) aged 18 to 70 years (inclusive); 2. Subject intends to undergo instrumented surgical treatment in the lumbar spinal disc for their lower back pain, independent of this research protocol; 3. Subject is to be treated with FDA-cleared or FDA-approved devices independent of this research protocol; 4. Subject has a preoperative Oswestry Disability Questionnaire score ≥35 out of 100 points (35/100); 5. Subject has a VAS back pain score of ≥40mm; 6. Subject has failed at least ≥ 6 months of non-operative treatment (for example: physical therapy, bed rest, anti-inflammatory or analgesic medications, chiropractic care, acupuncture, massage therapy or home-directed lumbar exercise programs) OR requires urgent surgical treatment per the investigator; 7. Subject has signed the IRB approved Informed Consent Form; and 8. Subject is psychosocially, mentally and physically able and willing to fully comply with this protocol including adhering to follow-up schedule and requirements and filling out forms.

Exclusion criteria

1. Subject has had prior lumbar back surgery or intradiscal treatments at any lumbar level (Note: diagnostic provocative or anesthetic discography are not excluded; micro-discectomy, decompression, or laminectomy patients greater than 6 months postop are not excluded); 2. Subject has a lumbar spine diagnosis, based on radiographic evidence, of clinically relevant lumbar vertebral abnormalities (except Modic end-plate changes, which are not excluded), including: * Grade 3 Spondylolisthesis (Grade 1 or Grade 2 is allowed) * Pars fracture, at the involved level * Spondylolysis * Lumbar scoliosis with a Cobb angle of greater than 20° * Evidence of prior fracture or trauma to the L1, L2, L3, L4, or L5 levels in either compression or burst * Lumbar kyphosis 3. Subject is contraindicated for a standard lumbar MRI exam 4. Women who are currently pregnant (or believe they may be at risk of being or becoming pregnant), or are breast feeding, during the study period when scans will be performed 5. Subject has a chronic disease (other than degenerative disc disease), chronic pain (other than low back pain), or psychological dysfunction, which may, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator, compromise a subject's ability to comply with study procedures, and/or may confound data

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in back pain on 100mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain AssessmentBaseline to 12 monthsThe primary endpoint is change in back pain as measured on a 100mm VAS Back at 12 months compared to baseline. VAS is a measurement instrument that measures the amount of pain that a subject feels ranges across a continuum from none to an extreme amount of pain. Higher scores closer to the extreme pain range indicate worse outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
20 mm improvement in back pain on 100mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain AssessmentFrom Baseline to each follow up visit (3-Months, 6-Months, 12- Months, and 24 Months)VAS is a measurement instrument that measures the amount of pain that a subject feels ranges across a continuum from none to an extreme amount of pain. Higher scores closer to the extreme pain range indicate worse outcome.
20 mm improvement in worst leg pain on a 100mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain AssessmentFrom Baseline to each follow up visit (3-Months, 6-Months, 12- Months, and 24 Months)VAS is a measurement instrument that measures the amount of pain that a subject feels ranges across a continuum from none to an extreme amount of pain. Higher scores closer to the extreme pain range indicate worse outcome.
Patient reported treatment satisfaction surveyEach follow up visit (3-Months, 6-Months, 12- Months, and 24 Months)Patient Satisfaction survey is a self-reported questionnaire to measure the subject's satisfaction of the treatment under the protocol.
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 scoreEach follow up visit (3-Months, 6-Months, 12- Months, and 24 Months)The PROMIS-29 v2. 0 profile assesses pain intensity using a single 0-10 numeric rating item and seven health domains (physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance) using four items per domain.
Cumulative proportion of responders (CPRA) for 15 point Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) change (out of 100)From Baseline to each follow up visit (3-Months, 6-Months, 12- Months, and 24 Months)The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a 10-item questionnaire that scores disability on a percentile scale from 0-100%. The ODI score is interpreted as follows: 0-20%: Minimal disability 20-40%: Moderate disability 40-60%: Severe disability 60-80%: Crippling effects 80-100%: Completely disabled and bedbound
Absence of Secondary surgical interventionFrom Baseline through study completion, 24-MonthsSecondary surgical interventions may include revision, reoperation, removal or supplemental fixation at any level in the lumbar spine.
Correlation of preoperative NOCISCAN Biomarkers with preoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Assessment ScoresFrom Baseline through study completion, 24-MonthsVAS is a measurement instrument that measures the amount of pain that a subject feels ranges across a continuum from none to an extreme amount of pain. Higher scores closer to the extreme pain range indicate worse outcome.

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTRyan Bond
rbond@aclarion.com724-991-3369
CONTACTAndy Murillo
amurillo@aclarion.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 11, 2026