Skip to content

Comparison of the Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Corticosteroid Injection and Paraffin Therapy in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Comparison of the Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Corticosteroid Injection and Paraffin Therapy in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06658886
Enrollment
46
Registered
2024-10-26
Start date
2024-11-10
Completion date
2025-02-25
Last updated
2024-12-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of paraffin therapy, a physical therapy modality, and ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome, the most common entrapment neuropathy. By doing so, the study will evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of these two alternative, low-side-effect treatments for managing this frequently encountered condition.

Detailed description

A total of 46 patients, aged 18-65, diagnosed with mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome based on electrophysiological studies, will be included in the study.Pain levels will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and functional impairment will be measured with the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ). Electrophysiological evaluations will be performed by a neurology specialist at the 1st and 3rd month follow-ups outside of working hours and without being billed to the Social Security Institution (SGK). VAS, BCTQ scores, and electrophysiological parameters will be evaluated at baseline, and at the 4th and 12th-week follow-ups post-treatment. Electrophysiological measurements will include median nerve distal motor latency (MMNDL), median nerve distal sensory latency (MNSDL), sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV), compound muscle action potential (CMAP), and sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) amplitudes.

Interventions

OTHERNo intervention

No intervention

Sponsors

Beylikduzu State Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged 18-65. * Diagnosed with mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome based on electrophysiological studies. * Received either ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection or paraffin therapy. * Symptoms persisting for at least 3 months.

Exclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of other conditions causing neuropathic symptoms (e.g., polyneuropathy, brachial plexopathy, thoracic outlet syndrome). * History of previous injection or surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analog Scale (VAS):0 day, 4th week and 12th weekThe VAS will be used to measure pain intensity. Patients will mark their pain level on a 10 cm scale, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst imaginable pain. This will be evaluated at baseline, and at the 4th and 12th weeks post-treatment.
Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire Symptom Severity Scale (BCTQ-SSS)0 day, 4th week and 12th weekThe SSS assesses the severity of carpal tunnel symptoms such as pain, tingling, and numbness. The total score for this scale ranges from a minimum of 11 to a maximum of 55. A lower score indicates mild or no symptoms, while a higher score suggests more severe symptoms. As the score increases, the severity of symptoms worsens, with a score closer to 55 reflecting a significantly greater impact on daily life.
Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire Functional Status Scale (BCTQ-FSS)0 day, 4th week and 12th weekThe SSS assesses the severity of carpal tunnel symptoms such as pain, tingling, and numbness. The total score for this scale ranges from a minimum of 11 to a maximum of 55. A lower score indicates mild or no symptoms, while a higher score suggests more severe symptoms. As the score increases, the severity of symptoms worsens, with a score closer to 55 reflecting a significantly greater impact on daily life.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Motor nerve conduction velocity0 day, 4th week and 12th weekIt is a finding from electrophysiological evaluation
Median nerve distal motor latency0 day, 4th week and 12th weekIt is a finding from electrophysiological evaluation
Motor nerve action potential amplitude0 day, 4th week and 12th weekIt is a finding from electrophysiological evaluation
Sensory nerve action potential amplitude0 day, 4th week and 12th weekIt is a finding from electrophysiological evaluation
Median nerve distal sensory latency0 day, 4th week and 12th weekIt is a finding from electrophysiological evaluation
Sensory nerve conduction velocity0 day, 4th week and 12th weekIt is a finding from electrophysiological evaluation

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

Primary ContactBüşra Şirin Ahısha, MD
bsrn080@gmail.com(0212) 856 27 40
Backup ContactBüşra Şirin Ahısha
bsrn080@gmail.com02124443322

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026