Skip to content

Linkage to Care and Treatment of Chronic HBV Patients

Achieving Linkage to Retention and Treatment After Territory-wide Screening and Care Referral for Chronic Hepatitis B Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06658678
Acronym
HBV
Enrollment
803
Registered
2024-10-26
Start date
2021-04-03
Completion date
2022-12-31
Last updated
2024-10-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatitis B, Chronic

Brief summary

Chronic hepatitis B remains the leading cause of liver related mortality and morbidity globally and locally. Countries have been formulating initiatives to meet the WHO target of eliminating viral hepatitis by 2030. However, data on the most important aspect of management of chronic hepatitis B, namely linkage to care and treatment, remains scarce. In order to achieve the WHO goal, treatment rate of eligible patients should reach 80%.

Detailed description

Diagnosing patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and establishing linkage to treatment is important in achieving the World Health Organization (WHO) objectives in eliminating HBV as a public health threat by 2030. Global HBV diagnosis rates and treatment rates among eligible patients were 10% and 5% respectively. In Mainland China and Hong Kong, estimated diagnosis and treatment coverage were 19-27% and 11-22% respectively, similarly much lower than the WHO 2030 goals of 90% for diagnosis and 80% for treatment. A recent modeling study demonstrated that even if a modest 50% diagnosis rate was achieved in China, this will result in a 19% mortality decline, with 2.1 million deaths averted. Currently, HBV screening is recommended for persons born in regions with a HBV prevalence of 22%. This includes the vast majority of East Asian countries. In the HBV care continuum, identifying patients and arranging linkage to care is only the first step. Long-term retention of patients is critical, especially since with disease progression, treatment eligibility rates can increase by 30% after 3 years of follow-up. Nonetheless, there has been a paucity of data on HBV care continuum retention rates after referrai and linkage. A US-based study did found that among diagnosed patients, only 63.2% achieved linkage to referral, and only 44.1% remained retained in clinical care after at least three clinic visits. Another study in Italy found a higher retention of 60% after 5 years; besides African ethnicity and concomitant HIV infection, the study failed to identify any predictors of retention failure, yet 74.8% of retained patients subsequently required treatment. There has been otherwise no published data on linkage to retention rates in endemic regions including East Asia, and on whether the care continuum cascade can successfully link referral to treatment. Our center previously conducted a territory-wide prevalence study of HBV, and out of >10,000 screened participants, the investigators identified 803 hepatitis B surface antigen (HBSAg)-positive individuals, with a mean age of 53.7 (135.8) years (36.7% male). As part of linkage to care, all patients were subsequently referred to their respective geographical cluster hospital. The investigators recently performed a follow-up telephone survey of the 803 patients, asking on their status of clinical follow-up and liver-related treatment. Our preliminary data found a retention rate of only 37.1% after 2 years post-referral. However, among retained patients, 51.2% were already started on anti-HBV treatment, suggesting that high rates of treatment eligibility may also exist in unretained patients. Hence, to enhance linkage to treatment, linkage to retention rates will need improvement. There is emerging evidence on the effect of different interventions in improving the care continuum of viral hepatitis, although the majority of evidence is concentrated in hepatitis C virus and not HBV. Clinical reminders have been demonstrated to be the most effective method to improve testing rates; such reminders may also be useful to in improving clinic attendance and retention. On the other hand, the data on educational materials is less consistent. Data was concentrated in Asian migrants in North America, with some based on non-randomized studies, and could be susceptible to selection, attrition and reporting bias. Interventions using social media and mobile technology may be promising. Experience from engaging patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection have found social media effective in reaching out to marginalized individuals, especially among those of a younger age. It would be interesting to see if educational videos disseminated on mobile devices via social media can improve linkage to retention and treatment for HBV.

Interventions

OTHERReceiving an educational intervention

Patient not receiving any educational intervention

Sponsors

The University of Hong Kong
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* CHB (HBV DNA+ or HBsAg+ for more than 6 months) * Age \>18 * Treatment naive at initial presentation

Exclusion criteria

* Prior HBV treatment * Organ transplant or other immunosuppression * HIV, HDV, HCV co-infection * Decompensated or HCC patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The effect of education intervention on rate of retention in care in chronic hepatitis B patients identified from a territory wide screening program12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The treatment rate in chronic hepatitis B patients up to 5 years after diagnosis5 years
The rate of viral suppression in chronic hepatitis B patients up to 5 years after diagnosis5 years
The rate of complication in chronic hepatitis B patients up to 5 years after diagnosis5 years
Factors affecting rate of retention in care from patient perspective in the form of questionnaire survey12 months

Countries

Hong Kong

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026