Skip to content

SISIPUSH: Evaluation of Hemolysis and Iatrogenic Anemia Using the Push-pull Method to Obtain Blood from Pediatric Patients with Central Venous Catheters

SISIPUSH: Evaluation of Hemolysis and Iatrogenic Anemia Using the Push-pull Method to Obtain Blood from Pediatric Patients with Central Venous Catheters

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06657534
Acronym
SISIPUSH
Enrollment
150
Registered
2024-10-24
Start date
2024-10-14
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2024-10-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pediatrics, Central Venous Catheter

Keywords

push-pull technique

Brief summary

Anemia is frequently observed during hospitalizations, both in adults and children. In addition to the fact that anemia can be caused by an acute or chronic condition, blood samples taken during the hospital stay contribute to additional blood loss (so-called iatrogenic anemia). For children, the relative amount of blood taken at each blood collection is greater than in adults. It is therefore expected that in children, due to the lower circulating blood volume, the relative impact of repeated blood sampling is greater and interventions such as sparing the number of blood samples or blood volume can have a relevant impact on the onset of anemia, the need for iron supplements or blood transfusions and the general clinical recovery. For children, only limited data are available on the development of iatrogenic anemia during hospital stay. In a study of children in an intensive care unit, a decrease in hemoglobin of 0.7 g/dl can already be seen with an average stay of 4.5 days (and an average number of blood samples of 2.9) (François et al. Ped Crit Car Med, 2022). The average blood volume lost to blood samples during the stay is 3.9 ml/kg, which already corresponds to 5% of the total blood volume. Interventions to decrease the frequency of blood sampling or to perform the same analyses on a smaller blood volume (e.g. adapted, smaller blood tubes for children) are therefore useful in preventing the development of anemia during a hospital stay, especially in children. Alternative methods have been described to save on blood volume when performing blood sampling, especially if these are performed via central venous catheters (surgically or non-surgically placed). To obtain a suitable sample via such catheters, the usual technique is to obtain 5 to 10 ml of blood and discard the volume (so-called waste blood) before the sample for laboratory analysis is obtained (typically only 1-2 ml). A recently published technique is the so-called push-pull method (described by McBride et al, J Infus Nurs 2018), in which blood sampling can be performed without waste blood. The push-pull technique has been studied in children, but mainly in oncological and intensive care units. Paired analyses have verified that the technique provides a reliable sample for most blood analyses, including blood count, electrolytes, liver and kidney function parameters, CRP, but also coagulation factors and therapeutic drug monitoring. The occurrence of complications, of which the development of catheter-related bacteremia is of particular importance, is not described. A beneficial effect on anemia onset has not yet been described, usually due to low patient numbers per study (23-35 patients). In SISIPUSH, we compare the push-pull technique with the standard-of-care in hospitalised children who undergo blood sampling via a central venous catheter for diagnostic reasons (in the context of routine care). By means of a 1:1 randomization, eligible patients who gave informed consent are assigned to one of the two methods for the remainder of the hospitalization. From the moment of randomization until discharge from the hospital, data will be collected from the medical file that are collected routinely (number of blood samples, hemoglobin values, number of blood transfusions, markers of hemolysis, age and gender, reason for hospitalization, type of catheter) and compared between the two groups. In parallel, nurses score the easy of use and satisfaction with the procedure at each blood sample.

Interventions

push-pull technique as described by McBride et al, J Infus Nurs 2018

Standard of care method to obtain blood with waste blood

Sponsors

University Ghent
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital, Ghent
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
0 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* hospitalized patient at the Specialist Pediatric Department of Ghent University Hospital * age 0-18 years * presence of a central venous catheter for diagnostic or therapeutic reasons of the type surgically placed (Hickman, port-a-cath) or non-surgically placed (vena jugularis interna, subclavia, femoralis,...) * patent catheter with possibility of infusion of fluids and collection of blood on at least one of the lumens * clinical and/or radiographic confirmation of correct central position of the catheter tip * at least one blood collection per week hospitalization expected or already planned

Exclusion criteria

* presence of a bloodstream or catheter related infection before or at the time of randomization

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evolution of hemoglobinfrom randomization to discharge from the hospital or removal of the central venous cathetertrend of hemoglobin (from the first blood draw after randomization to the last blood draw during the same hospitalization), which is defined as the sum of the negative differences of hemoglobin determinations (grams per deciliter) between two consecutive blood draws

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hemolysisfrom randomization to discharge from the hospital or removal of the central venous catheteranalysis of hemolysis parameters on all blood samples (distribution of serum potassium and lactate dehydrogenase between the two study populations)
Anemia onsetfrom randomization to discharge from the hospital or removal of the central venous catheterproportion of patients diagnosed with anemia (hemoglobin \<7 g/dl) during hospitalization
Need for erytrocyte transfusionfrom randomization to discharge from the hospital or removal of the central venous catheternumber of patients undergoing a packed red blood cell transfusion during hospitalization, expressed as proportion of patients compared to total number of patients, in number of transfusions per total number of blood samples and in number of transfusions per day of hospitalization since inclusion
Hemolytic samplesfrom randomization to discharge from the hospital or removal of the central venous catheterproportion of blood samples reported by the clinical laboratory as hemolytic
Failed blood samplesfrom randomization to discharge from the hospital or removal of the central venous catheterproportion of blood samples that were not analyzable and reason for this (hemolysis or other)
Bacteremia onsetfrom randomization to discharge from the hospital or removal of the central venous catheterproportion of patients with bacteremia (positive blood culture) during the course of the study
Catheter dysfunctionfrom randomization to discharge from the hospital or removal of the central venous catheterproportion of patients in whom the central venous catheter had to be removed early due to dysfunction or infection
Operator ease of usefrom randomization to discharge from the hospital or removal of the central venous catheterassessment of satisfaction (0-5) and complexity (0-5) of the procedure by the healthcare personnel performing the blood sampling

Countries

Belgium

Contacts

Primary ContactLevi Hoste, MD, PhD
levi.hoste@uzgent.be+32 9 332 35 40

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026