Skip to content

Comparitive Effects of Elliptical Training vs Resistance Training on Cardiopulmonary Parameters in Post CABG Patients

Comparitive Effects of Elliptical Training vs Resistance Training on Cardiopulmonary Parameters in Post CABG Patients

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06656117
Enrollment
44
Registered
2024-10-24
Start date
2024-04-15
Completion date
2025-01-31
Last updated
2024-10-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Bypass Graft CABG

Keywords

CABG, Elliptical training, Resistance training

Brief summary

COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF ELLIPTICAL TRAINING VS RESISTANCE TRAINING ON CARDIOPULMONARY PARAMETERS IN POST CABG PATIENTS

Detailed description

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been widely and increasingly used since the 1960s as a common surgical procedure to restore blood flow into the stenotic coronary arteries . It is one of the effective ways to treat coronary artery disease, which can significantly relieve patients' myocardial ischemia and hypoxia symptoms and improve their quality of life. Data were collected from Itefaq hospital, sehat medical complex Lahore. Borg dyspnea and quality of life (SF12) questioner were used before and after the intervention. Assessment was done through the tool before and after the treatment.

Interventions

• Throughout the training, participants' heart rates were monitored, and they were asked to report any discomfort or unusual signs.

OTHERResistance training

• Throughout the training, participants' heart rates were monitored, and they were asked to report any discomfort or unusual signs.

Sponsors

Riphah International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The study was single blinded,as accessor of the study were kept blind to the intervention group

Intervention model description

In this parallel-group randmoized control trial (RCT),post Cabag patients will br assigned to either elliptical training group or to resistance training group .This study aims to evualate the comparative effects of eliptical training vs resistance training on cardiopulmonary parameters

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Both male and female age 45-55 years. * Post Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) patients at phase III cardiac rehabilitation were included . * Patients who had physically active lower limbs were included .

Exclusion criteria

* Participants who had psychological conditions that may influence understanding or answering of questionnaire. * Patients with other cardiac lesions combined with simultaneous surgical management, such as valvular lesions, macro vascular lesions, and ventricular wall tumors. * Patients diagnosed with emergency CABG, minimally invasive CABG, or recurrent cardiac surgery. * Patients with severe dysfunction of important organs such as the lung, liver, and kidney. * Patients with recent major surgery or trauma of other parts of body. * Pregnant or lactating women.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
modified borg dyspnea scale4 weeksThe modified Borg dyspnea score is a version of the CR10; 45 it uses a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no dyspnea and 10 represents maximal dyspnea. Scores are obtained at the end of the 6MWD test and reflect the maximum degree of dyspnea at any time during the walk test .
Health related quality of life(SF12)4 weeksThe SF-12 Health version 2 is a generic short form health survey developed in the USA from the original SF-36. It produces two summary measures evaluating physical and mental self-perceived health; for this reason, it could be a suitable and complete tool to assess the self-perceived quality of life of university students because it allows investigating both the aspects .

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026