Skip to content

Comparison of Effect of Different Methods of Cognitive Loading on Gait of Normal Healthy Students

The Effects of Different Types of Cognitive Load on Gait

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06656078
Enrollment
82
Registered
2024-10-24
Start date
2024-10-24
Completion date
2024-12-30
Last updated
2025-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cognitive Load, Performance

Brief summary

Comparison of effect of different methods of cognitive loading on gait of normal healthy students.

Interventions

OTHER1. WORKING MEMORY TASK:

Arithmetic task: backward counting with serial 3 subtractions out loud. Group 1 and Group 2 participants will be asked to count backwards with serial 3 subtractions out loud while walking 10 meters. There is considerable disruption of performance because of simultaneous articulatory suppression. However, when errors were observed they were calculated to be numerically close to the correct figure which suggests that performance was not completely disrupted by suppression of articulation.

Modified Stroop test or Stroop colour word test: Participants are asked to name the colour of ink that each word is printed. It is the most frequent test used to show attention bias in anxiety patients. This test will appear on the mobile phone in their hands while they walk to increase the effect of cognitive loading.

OTHER3. MOTOR TASK:

Carrying a tray with four glasses filled with water. Participants will be asked to hold a tray of glasses filled with water and walk 10 meters to calculate the effect of cognitive loading on gait.

Sponsors

Riphah International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Research

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
17 Years to 20 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male and female students from colleges of Abbottabad. * Age limit (17 to 20) According to (FSC admission criteria age of the student should not be more than 18 to enter the college.) * Healthy individuals without any neurological and MSK disorder. (screening will be done before performing the test on the student, questions regarding the above-mentioned conditions and consent will be signed before starting the test)

Exclusion criteria

* Any student with visible physical deformity or MSK disorder will not be included in this research (15) * Any student with a psychiatric or neurological disorder will not be included (16) * Any student with cardiac abnormality will be excluded from this research (17) * Any student who does not fall in this age group will not be included in this research. * Colleges outside Abbottabad will not be included in this research.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Walking speed (m/s)BaselineFor gait activity, the Gait and Balance mobile app (G&B) measures the walking speed with moderate to excellent reliability while the participant is walking normally with (ICC=0.93). Walking speed usually decreases if the participant performs a task that challenges dynamic balance.
Gait symmetry (%)BaselineFor gait activity, the Gait and Balance mobile app (G&B) measures gait symmetry with moderate to excellent reliability while the participant is walking normally with (ICC=0.65) Gait symmetry tends to decrease if the participant undergoes a task that includes dynamic balance.
Step length(m)BaselineFor gait activity, the Gait and Balance mobile app (G&B) measures step length with moderate to excellent reliability while the participant is walking normally with (ICC=0.94). Step length usually increases with challenged dynamic balance-based activities.
Step time(s)BaselineFor gait activity, the Gait and Balance mobile app (G&B) measures step time with moderate to excellent reliability while the participant is walking normally with (ICC=0.84). Step time increases under the effect of dynamic balance-based activities.
Step time variability(%)BaselineFor gait activity, the Gait and Balance mobile app (G&B) measures step time with moderate to poor reliability while the participant is walking normally (ICC=0.51). Step time variability tends to increase if a participant undergoes dynamic balance-based activities.
Step length variability(%)BaselineFor gait activity, the G&B app measures step length variability with moderate to poor reliability while the participant is walking normally (ICC=0.16). step length variability tends to increase with activities that involve dynamic balance.
Step length asymmetry(%)During Cognitive loading testsFor gait activity, the Gait and Balance mobile app (G&B) measures step length asymmetry with moderate to poor reliability while the participant is walking normally with (ICC=0.6). Step length asymmetry tends to increase with tasks that include dynamic balance.
Step time asymmetry(%)BaselineFor gait activity, the Gait and Balance mobile app (G&B) measures step time asymmetry with moderate reliability while the participant is walking normally with (ICC=0.68). Step time asymmetry tends to increase with activities that include dynamic balance.

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026