The Time Taken for Successful Tracheal Intubation in Each Technique
Conditions
Keywords
endotracheal intubation, newborn, direct laryngoscopy,video laryngoscopy
Brief summary
The children were randomized into two groups to receive orotracheal intubation after anesthetic induction with neuromuscular blockade, either by direct laryngoscopy (DL, DL group) or by C-MAC video laryngoscopy (VL group)
Detailed description
prospective randomized study including newborns , requiring orotracheal intubation for surgery or mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit. The children were randomized into two groups to receive orotracheal intubation after anesthetic induction with neuromuscular blockade, either by direct laryngoscopy (DL, DL group) or by C-MAC video laryngoscopy (VL group).
Interventions
DEVICEVideo Laryngoscopy
orotracheal intubation by C-Mac ( Video laryngoscopy)
DEVICEDirect Laryngoscopy
Orotracheal intubation using Direct Laryngoscopy
Sponsors
Tunis University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Minutes to 30 Days
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* newborns requiring orotracheal intubation for surgery or mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit
Exclusion criteria
* age\> 01 month
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| time taken for successful tracheal intubation | during intubation |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| the need for additional device | during intubation | — |
| the number of attempts | during intubation | — |
| Complications during intubation | during intubation | complications such as desaturation and selective intubation. |
Countries
Tunisia
Contacts
Primary Contactsalma Aouadi, Hospital university assistant
Outcome results
None listed