Skip to content

The Systematic Evaluation of the Surgery, Using the Ratio of the Window Area to the Volume of Bone Graft Material

Retrospective Study of Small Window Lateral Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06654492
Enrollment
77
Registered
2024-10-23
Start date
2017-08-02
Completion date
2024-09-24
Last updated
2024-10-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation

Keywords

LW-MSFE

Brief summary

Objective: To conduct a systematic mid-to-long-term efficacy evaluation of the small window lateral maxillary sinus floor elevation surgery, using the ratio of the window area to the volume of bone graft material as an innovative evaluation metric; to provide clinical evidence for the treatment and assessment of maxillary sinus elevation surgery. Research Content and Methods: The study included all patients who underwent lateral wall small window surgery performed by Dr. Xie Liangkun from 2017 to 2024 in Affiliated Stomatology Hospital of Kunming Medical University. Seventy-seven patients underwent cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) at each stage before grafting, before the surgery,immediately after the surgery, 6 months postoperatively, and after tooth placement. The CBCT data were imported into Mimics software to measure the volume of bone graft material at different periods (b value), and The photos which recording window size during surgery were imported into ImageJ software to measure the window area (a value). CBCT was also used to measure the distance from the window to the sinus floor, the thickness of the lateral wall bone plate, and the thickness of the Schneiderian membrane as secondary measurement indicators. The ratio of a/b was statistically analyzed for correlation with various secondary indicators, and conclusions were drawn. Bone cores taken 6 months after grafting (before implant placement) were subjected to Micro-CT scanning and histological analysis to evaluate the bone formation effects.

Detailed description

Research significance:The first part is the elevation of maxillary sinus floor through minimally invasive window side wall small window. Through retrospective study of implant retention rate, complications, patient subjective perception, anatomical factors and other indicators, it is used to comprehensively evaluate the clinical efficacy of this surgical procedure. In the second part, representative bone columns are taken for Micro CT scanning to evaluate the osseointegration from a histological perspective. Mimics software performs three-dimensional scanning of the transplant area, and the ratio of the window area to the volume of the transplant part is used as the main measurement index to demonstrate that minimally invasive window opening can achieve ideal bone grafting effects. Further verify the success or failure of minimally invasive side wall fenestration surgery. At present, relevant studies use this ratio as the main research data, and there is no use of 3D scanning to study changes in bone transplant areas. There are also few studies evaluating the binding of bone tissue using Micro CT, and most of them use CBCT 2D measurement data for evaluation.

Interventions

PROCEDUREThe dimension of the window for lateral window maxillary sinus elevation surgery

The window size for a single implant site should not exceed 25 square millimeters, while the window size for consecutive multiple implant sites should not exceed 40 square millimeters.

Sponsors

Kunming Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Aged 18 years or older; 2. Missing posterior maxillary teeth; 3. The missing tooth area has been edentulous for at least 3 months; 4. No acute severe maxillary sinus inflammation, and no tumor or other space-occupying lesions within the maxillary sinus; 5. The residual bone height (RBH) in the missing tooth area is less than 4mm; 6. Sufficient alveolar bone width in the missing tooth area to ensure implant placement; 7. Signed an informed consent form and can return for follow-up visits as scheduled.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with systemic diseases not suitable for implantation: such as uncontrolled hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, bone metabolic diseases, head and face radiotherapy, etc.; 2. Uncontrolled periodontitis or mucosal disease patients; 3. Patients with bruxism; 4. Patients who have undergone implant placement or artificial bone material implantation in the missing tooth area; 5. Patients with mental illness.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The window area of the lateral wall maxillary sinus floor elevation surgeryimmediately after surgeryintraoperative window photos were imported into ImageJ software to measure the window area (a value)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the volume of bone graft materialbefore implant surgery, immediately after surgery,6 months after surgeryImport the CBCT scans from immediately after surgery, half a year postoperatively, and after tooth placement into the Mimics software to measure the volume

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026