Skip to content

Electrical Cardioversion As a Predictor in Postoperative Preservation of Sinus Rhythm

Electrical Cardioversion As a Predictor in Postoperative Preservation of Sinus Rhythm in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Before Radio Frequency Pulmonary Vein Isolation

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06654401
Enrollment
125
Registered
2024-10-23
Start date
2024-11-01
Completion date
2026-01-01
Last updated
2024-12-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Fibrillation, Persistent

Keywords

Atrial Fibrillation, Cardioversion, Catheter ablation, Late recurrence, Left atrial voltage, Left atrial volume

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate benefits of electric cardioversion in the early and long-term postoperative period in patients after radiofrequency catheter isolation of pulmonary veins. Parameters of the left atrium will be evaluated by transthoracic echocardiography and electroanatomic mapping. Preservation of the sinus rhythm will be assessed by 24-hour electrocardiographic monitoring. The main question that is planned to be answered is: Does a reverse remodeling of the left atrium and/or a decrease in the progression of the fibrosis zone occur after performing electrical cardioversion (and before subsequent catheter ablation) in patients with persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (AF)? Can performed electrical cardioversion serve as a predictor of AF freedom in this group of patients? Participants will undergo a follow-up examinations (echocardiography, ECG, 24-hour ECG monitoring) at the 3rd, 6th and 12th months after catheter ablation. Based on the results of these examinations, the recurrence rate of AF will be estimated. Two groups of patients will include both persistent and long-standing persistent AF. Experimental group will include patients who underwent electrical cardioversion before the intervention, and active comparator group will include those patients who did not undergo it. The experimental group will be subdivided into a persistent AF patients who were successfully cardioverted in sinus rhythm and persistent AF patients who failed to restore sinus rhythm during DC at the time of catheter ablation. Analysis and comparison of subgroups will be performed.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTTransthoracic echocardiography

Standard assessment of the parameters of the left atrium: size, volume, volume indices

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST24-hour ECG Monitor

Assessment of cardiac arrhythmias according to 24-hour monitoring data

PROCEDUREElectroanatomic mapping

Intraoperative assessment of low voltage areas (potential fibrosis zones)

Sponsors

Saint Petersburg State University, Russia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Prospective, randomized, single-center study with 2 groups of patients (investigating and control arms)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Informed consent signed by the patient to participate in the study. * Persistent atrial fibrillation resistant to antiarrhythmic drugs for 6 months or more * The size of the left atrium is less than 55 mm, volume is less than 130 ml, volume index (LP) is less than 55 ml/m2

Exclusion criteria

* Reversible causes of atrial fibrillation (hyperthyroidism, pericarditis, myocarditis). * Patients in need of myocardial revascularization and/or heart valvular disease correction. * Any previous intervention (including MAZE surgery, thoracoscopic ablation; implanted occluder of the auricle of the left atrium.). * Patients with severe concomitant pathology requiring correction. * Contraindications for administration of anticoagulant therapy. * Documented presence of a blood clot in the cavity of the left atrium or other reasons preventing the insertion of catheters into the left atrium. * BMI of 40 or more

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Freedom from atrial fibrillation 6 months after catheter ablationEchocardiographic assessment of the parameters of the left atrium and 24-hour ECG monitoring is performed at the time of admission to the hospital; after 3,6 and 12 months after intervention or the latest data in the event of death, whenever comes firstAbsence of events of sustained atrial tachycardia according to 24-hour ECG monitoring

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reverse remodeling of the left atrium and improvement of the contractility of the left ventricleEchocardiographic assessment of the parameters of the left atrium and 24-hour ECG monitoring is performed at the time of admission to the hospital; after 3,6 and 12 months after intervention or the latest data in the event of death, whenever comes firstAn increase in the LV ejection fraction, a decrease in the volume and size of the left atrium according to transthoracic echocardiography
Freedom from atrial fibrillation 12 months after catheter ablationEchocardiographic assessment of the parameters of the left atrium and 24-hour ECG monitoring is performed at the time of admission to the hospital; after 3,6 and 12 months after intervention or the latest data in the event of death, whenever comes firstAbsence of events of sustained atrial tachycardia according to 24-hour monitoring
Improving the quality of life of patients with atrial fibrillationPatients fill out questionnaires upon admission to the hospital; 3, 6 and 12 months after surgical treatment or the latest data in the event of death, whenever comes firstAssessment of the quality of life of patients with atrial fibrillation based on a questionnaire: Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-life (AFEQT) Questionnaire - provides an overall score; plus scores for symptoms, daily activities, treatment concerns, and treatment satisfaction. Overall or subscale scores range from 0-100. A score of 0 corresponds to complete disability (or responding extremely limited, difficult or bothersome to all questions answered), while a score of 100 corresponds to no disability (or responding not at all limited, difficult or bothersome to all questions answered).

Countries

Russia

Contacts

Primary ContactAnton A Sheremet, MD
sheremet.dr@yandex.ru+79313084398
Backup ContactAleksei A Filippov, MD, PhD
aleksei.filippov.chb@gmail.com+79819553639

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026