Skip to content

Rhomboid Intercostal Block Versus Retrolaminar Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Thoracoscopic Sympathectomy

Ultrasound-guided Rhomboid Intercostal Block Versus Retrolaminar Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Thoracoscopic Sympathectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06653803
Enrollment
60
Registered
2024-10-22
Start date
2025-08-01
Completion date
2026-01-30
Last updated
2025-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post Operative Pain

Keywords

Rhomboid Intercostal Block, Retrolaminar Block, Regional Analgesia

Brief summary

Background: Although thoracoscopic sympathectomy is made via small incisions, it is associated with severe postoperative pain. Both Rhomboid intercostal block (RIB) and Retrolaminar block (RLB) are recent techniques used for pain control after such procedures Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of RIB and RLB in providing postoperative analgesia after thoracoscopic sympathectomy in adult patients and their impact on the patient's outcomes. Patients and Methods: This prospective, randomized (1:1), double-blind clinical trial; will be carried out on 60 patients scheduled for elective thoracoscopic sympathectomy under general anesthesia at our hospital. Patients will be randomly allocated into two equal groups (30 patients each) and will receive: in group A; general anesthesia with intraoperative ipsilateral ultrasound-guided RIB, whereas in group B; general anesthesia with intraoperative ipsilateral ultrasound-guided RLB.

Interventions

Intraoperative Ipsilateral Ultrasound-guided RIB

Intraoperative Ipsilateral Ultrasound-guided RLB

Sponsors

Damanhour Teaching Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status ≤ II * Age from 18 to 60 years * Body Mass Index (BMI) \< 35 kg/m²

Exclusion criteria

* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status \> II * Age \< 18 years or \> 60 years * Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 35 * Local infection at the puncture site * Altered mental status * Pregnant women * Allergy to study drugs * Chronic pain * Coagulation abnormalities or on anticoagulants * Severe hepatic or kidney disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean and Standard deviation of time to the first request of postoperative rescue analgesic (minutes) (mean±SD)24 hours after the end of surgeryThe time interval between the block performance and the first request of postoperative analgesia

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean and Standard deviation of Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) score (mean±SD)24 hours after the end of surgeryNPRS measures the severity of postoperative pain, it is a 11 point scale from 0-10; where 0=No pain and 10=Worst possible pain (At PACU, 1h, 3h, 6h, 12h, 18h, 24h) after the end of surgery
Mean and Standard deviation of the total dose of the rescue analgesic consumed (milligrams) (mean±SD)24 hours after the end of surgeryThe total dose of the rescue analgesic consumed in the first 24 hours after the end of surgery

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactAhmed M Shaat, MD
ahmedshaat99@gmail.com00201223482709

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026