Class I Malocclusion
Conditions
Brief summary
The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate the effect of Smile Arc Marginal Ridge Approach (SAMRA) versus MBT chart method for bracket positioning on orthodontic treatment results. The main questions it aims to answer are: Is there a difference in orthodontic treatment results between smile arc marginal ridge approach (SAMRA) and MBT chart method for bracket positioning? Does SAMRA provide more accurate orthodontic results and reduce the number of archwire bendings and brackets repositioning needed during finishing? The investigators will compare Smile Arc Marginal Ridge Approach (SAMRA) with MBT Chart Method (gold standard) to see if SAMRA provides more accurate orthodontic results and reduce the need for archwire bendings and brackets repositioning during finishing. Participants will: * Undergo orthodontic treatment and divided into two groups, Group A (SAMRA) and Group B (MBT Chart Method). * 0.018-inch MBT brackets will be used in both groups. * Follow ups every 1 month will take place to change the archwires after becoming passive. * After leveling and alignment is completed, orthodontic treatment results, number of archwire bendings and brackets repositioning needed will be determined to see which type of intervention is better or if both provide similar results.
Interventions
OTHERSmile Arc Marginal Ridge Approach (SAMRA)
Smile Arc Marginal Ridge Approach (SAMRA) is a new orthodontic bonding technique proposed by Dr. Dalia El Bokle where she stated that it provides more accurate orthodontic results and less time and effort needed during finished. No randomized clinical trials are done on this new approach yet so our study is the first one to test it. 0.018-inch MBT brackets will be used in our study.
OTHERMBT Chart Method
For our comparator group MBT Chart Method will be used. Using charts during orthodontic bonding procedures is considered the gold standard. 0.018-inch brackets will be used.
Sponsors
Cairo University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
11 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Orthodontic patients aged 11-30 years old. * Mild or moderate crowding not requiring tooth extraction. * Full permanent dentition including fully erupted 7s not necessarily 8s. * Good oral hygiene. * Skeletal and dentoalveolar class I malocclusion.
Exclusion criteria
* Systemic disease potentially affecting the study outcome. * Cleft lip and palate/syndromic patients. * Any signs or symptoms of temporomandibular disorders (TMD). * Previous orthodontic treatment. * Pregnant females. * Chronic use of medications.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Orthodontic treatment results | 6 months | Orthodontic treatment results will be assessed according to the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System (ABO-OGS) using the ABO measuring gauge. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Number of additional archwire bending and bracket repositioning needed | 6 months |
Countries
Egypt
Contacts
Primary ContactMedhat Mostafa Kamal
Outcome results
None listed