Skip to content

PK/PD Analysis of Ceftazidime/Avibactam or Cefiderocol With or Without Fosfomycin for the Treatment of Difficult To-treat Gram-negative Infections

Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Analysis of Ceftazidime/Avibactam or Cefiderocol With or Without Fosfomycin for the Treatment of Difficult To-treat Gram-negative Infections

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06651047
Acronym
PACCOF
Enrollment
120
Registered
2024-10-21
Start date
2024-07-09
Completion date
2025-09-30
Last updated
2024-10-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR), Gram Negative Infection

Keywords

Gram-negative infection, Ceftazidime/Avibactam, Cefiderocol, Fosfomycin, Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics targets, Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE)

Brief summary

A multicenter, national, prospective, observational pharmacological study of patients with difficult-to-treat Gram-negative infections treated with ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) or cefiderocol (CEF) monotherapy or combination therapy with ceftazidime/avibactam associated with fosfomycin (FOS) or cefiderocol associated with fosfomycin.

Detailed description

Gram-negative infections, particularly those caused by Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), have a dramatic impact on patient survival. Despite the introduction of new drugs in the last years have improved the outcome of patients with difficult-to-treat gram-negative infections, mortality and relapse rates are still relevant, especially in patients with high-risk sources such as pneumonia, and those in which the attainment of optimal exposure could be reduced by underlying renal disease. The use of a combination regimen in these scenarios has been proposed. However, a standardized approach to therapeutic management is still missing. To overcome this unmet clinical need, this study aims to investigate the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) optimization of antibiotic dosing regimens in patients with difficult-to-treat Gram-negative infections, using Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM). A prompt implementation of an appropriate targeted antibiotic therapy could represent a valuable approach to improve clinical outcomes in patients with difficult-to-treat Gram-negative infections. Moreover, more information is needed in pediatric populations where ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) is approved only for children aged \> 3 months (with the same indications as adults) and cefiderocol (CEF) is not approved. Indeed, cefiderocol is currently off-label administered in pediatric population using case-by-case dosages based on encouraging case reports. Since several in vitro studies have highlighted the synergistic effect of fosfomycin (FOS) with different antibiotic classes, including cephalosporins such drug could be an appealing option in combination therapy for the management of difficult-to-treat gram-negative infections, both with CAZ/AVI and CEF. However, real-life prospective studies are needed to investigate the potential benefit of combination therapy on clinical outcomes and the occurrence of further resistance. Thus, the correct dose of FOS along with the type of administration (i.e., intermittent, extended, or continuous infusion) are issues to establish. In particular, the primary aim of the study is to evaluate the probability of achieving pre-determined pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) efficacy targets for CAZ/AVI, CEF and FOS. Secondary objectives are: * to evaluate the relationship between the achievement of the PK/PD target of CAZ/AVI, CEF and FOS and microbiological eradication; * to evaluate the trend of clinical biomarkers in response to antibiotic therapy; * to investigate the diagnostic and prognostic value of protein biomarkers. This research is supported by EU funding within the Next Generation EU-MUR PNRR Extended Partnership initiative on Emerging Infectious Diseases (Project no. PE00000007, INF-ACT).

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

University of Bologna
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with infection due to a difficult-to-treat Gram-negative bacteria treated with CAZ/AVI alone, CEF alone, CAZ/AVI plus FOS, or CEF plus FOS (any age) * Signature of the informed consent (for pediatric patients: parents or guardians able to provide consent)

Exclusion criteria

* Premature newborns * Polymicrobial/mixed infections with the exception of cases with multiple Gram-negative bacteria susceptible to study drugs * Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) applications Inclusion Criteria for Healthy Volunteer Subjects: * Age ≥18 years * Signature of the informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PK/PD efficacy targets for study drugsFrom enrollment (treatment onset) to the end of treatment (up to 7 days)Primary endpoint will be the proportion of patients achieving the PK/PD efficacy target. Since these drugs are widely used in clinical practice, safety is not evaluated in this study

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Procalcitonin (PCT) and Interleukin-6 (IL-6)From day 0 (day of index positive culture) and day 7Difference in C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Procalcitonin (PCT) and Interleukin-6 (IL-6) between day 0 and day 7
Identification of new protein-based biomarkersFrom enrollment to the end of treatment (up to 7 days)* Difference in protein-based biomarkers at day 0 between study patients and a group of healthy subjects * Difference in protein-based biomarkers in study patients between different timepoints (from treatment onset to the end of treatment)
Difference in SOFA scoreFrom day 0 (day of index positive culture) and day 7Difference in SOFA score (pSOFA for pediatric patients) between day 0 (day of index positive cultures) and day 7
Relapse and/or reinfectionFrom enrollment to the end of the follow-up at three monthsRelapse (new infection with the same pathogen emerging after treatment) and/or reinfection (new infection with a different pathogen emerging after treatment) rates at day 90
All-cause mortalityFrom enrollment to the end of the follow-up at three monthsAll-cause mortality at day 30 and at day 90
Microbiological eradicationFrom day 0 (day of index positive culture) and day 7Microbiological eradication defined as bacteremia clearance or negativization of index diagnostic samples within 7 days from index BC

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Primary ContactMaddalena Giannella, MD PhD
maddalena.giannella@unibo.it+39 0512143199
Backup ContactNatascia Caroccia, PhD
natascia.caroccia@unibo.it+39 0512143595

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026