Skip to content

Desarda Tissue Technique vs Lichtenstein Technique for Primary Inguinal Hernia Repair

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Desarda Tissue Technique With the Lichtenstein Technique in Primary Inguinal Hernia Repair

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06650878
Acronym
HP-tis
Enrollment
478
Registered
2024-10-21
Start date
2025-03-26
Completion date
2030-12-01
Last updated
2025-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Inguinal Hernia Unilateral, Complications of Surgical Procedures or Medical Care

Keywords

Inguinal Hernia, lichtenstein technique, desarda technique

Brief summary

This study aims to evaluate whether a surgical technique (Desarda) is superior to the commonly used surgical technique (Lichtenstein) in inguinal hernia repair concerning the occurrence of postoperative complications. The Lichtenstein technique involves the use of a mesh, while the Desarda technique does not.

Interventions

PROCEDUREDesarda

This technique prevent from using a mesh to surgical repair of a inguinal hernia

PROCEDURELichtenstein

This technique implies using a mesh to surgical repair of a inguinal hernia

Sponsors

Consorci Sanitari de l'Alt Penedès i Garraf
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosed with primary inguinal hernia. * Body mass index below 31 * Indication for inguinal hernia repair via anterior approach, either as outpatient surgery (CMA) or elective admission. * Legal capacity to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with a weak, thin, or divided external oblique aponeurosis. * Participants diagnosed with any of the following conditions: * Ongoing oncological disease * Cirrhotic patients classified as Child B or higher * Women who have previously undergone a cesarean section * Cognitive or affective conditions that limit the ability to cooperate with the study procedures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of Participants with Post-surgery Complications3 monthsAny of the following complications: ● Sensation of a foreign body that persists beyond 3 months after surgery, self-reported by the participant ● Seroma within the first 30 days after surgery, verified through physical examination by a surgeon ● Hematoma within the first 30 days after surgery, verified through physical examination by a surgeon ● Infection at the surgical site within the first 30 days after surgery, verified by a surgeon ● Severe postoperative pain (7 or higher on the visual analog scale \[VAS\]) within the first 30 days after surgery, self-reported by the participant ● Chronic postoperative pain (persisting more than three months after surgery), self-reported by the participant ● Persistent loss of skin sensitivity beyond 30 days after surgery, self-reported by the participant ● Limitation of normal activities at home, outside the home, or at work beyond 3 months after surgery, self-reported by the participant

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Primary ContactJavier Errando, MD
jerrando@csapg.cat+34938960025
Backup ContactNoemi Casaponsa
recerca@csapg.cat+34 938960025

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026